Recognition and enforcement of 'foreign arbitral awards': a comparative study
by Anirudh Dadhich, Arun Kumar Bajaj
International Journal of Liability and Scientific Enquiry (IJLSE), Vol. 2, No. 1, 2009

Abstract: Arbitration does not necessarily end with the award. Within the differing domestic legal frameworks, the approaches adopted by individual jurisdiction like India and USA towards the grounds of opposition under the New York Convention (also provided in Geneva Convention, 1927, and UNCITRAL Model Law of 1985) cannot be the same. This even involves seminal questions relating to Limitation and Machinery of enforcement of Awards.

Online publication date: Sun, 30-Nov-2008

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Liability and Scientific Enquiry (IJLSE):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

Username:        Password:          Forgotten your password?

Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com