Comparing efficiency between public and private hospitals in South Korea Online publication date: Thu, 30-Oct-2008
by Haejong Lee, Hewon Lee, Keon-Hyung Lee, Thomas T.H. Wan
International Journal of Public Policy (IJPP), Vol. 3, No. 5/6, 2008
Abstract: Using the 2002 data from 32 Korean hospitals and using a matching method (16 public versus 16 private hospitals), this study compares Financial Efficiency (FE), Technical Efficiency (TE) and Service Efficiency (SE) between public and private hospitals. This research tests three hypotheses. The first hypothesis, that private hospitals will have higher FE than public hospitals is supported by the empirical findings. The second hypothesis, that public hospitals will have higher TE than private hospitals is also supported. The third hypothesis, that private hospitals will have higher levels of SE than public hospitals have, is not supported. Private hospitals have clear organisational goals that lead to higher FE. Public hospitals, in contrast, are less eager to improve FE than to improve TE because they are evaluated based on TE. The quality of services (i.e. SE) provided by public hospitals is indifferent from that of private hospitals. It is important to remember which aspects of efficiency we are dealing with when comparing between public and private hospitals.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Public Policy (IJPP):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook