Human factors in system reliability: lessons learnt from the Maeslant storm surge barrier in The Netherlands Online publication date: Wed, 03-Sep-2008
by Jos Vrancken, Jan Van den Berg, Michel Dos Santos Soares
International Journal of Critical Infrastructures (IJCIS), Vol. 4, No. 4, 2008
Abstract: The Maeslant storm surge barrier in the Netherlands is an interesting case in system reliability, first because of the great effort that has been put into making its operation reliable and into assessing its reliability, and second, because it has characteristics that make reliability assessment extremely hard. From its history a number of interesting conclusions can be drawn, of which the most important one is that there is no straightforward, definitive solution to reliability, but reliability is obtained and maintained in a continuous process of improvement. Other conclusions are that humans cannot be excluded from the operation or decision-making in systems such as the Maeslant barrier, that all methods for improving system reliability are most effective when the people involved are sharply aware of each method's limitations and that a continuous, open process of consulting a variety of experts is crucial to obtain the best possible reliability.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Critical Infrastructures (IJCIS):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook