KM criteria for different types of organisations
by Vittal S. Anantatmula, Michael Stankosky
International Journal of Knowledge and Learning (IJKL), Vol. 4, No. 1, 2008

Abstract: Criteria for Knowledge Management (KM) help determine results. Our research indicated that widely accepted criteria and performance measures have not been developed for KM. This study was undertaken to establish a set of criteria to assess the effectiveness of KM for different types of organisations. Subsequently, we will discuss how to expand these criteria to develop measures. Our methodology/approach is based on a literature review to determine a list of KM outcomes followed by the Delphi Technique and survey questionnaire methods. The findings of the Delphi Technique were used to supplement literature review findings. We used both these results to develop the survey questionnaire, which was aimed at establishing criteria for assessing KM success. Future research should focus on translating the soft measures of KM into detailed metrics.

Online publication date: Sun, 27-Jul-2008

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Knowledge and Learning (IJKL):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

Username:        Password:          Forgotten your password?

Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com