When medicine fails: evaluating website quality for interpretation of uncertain diagnoses Online publication date: Fri, 25-Jan-2008
by Daniel Lorence, Joanna Abraham
International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management (IJHTM), Vol. 9, No. 1, 2008
Abstract: To date there has been little agreement on standardised methods for conducting health website quality assessments. One useful approach would be to identify the information consumers are more likely to use in personal health assessments or self care, relative to traditional provider-based information. Ranking of such information might serve to better identify associated benefits or dangers for healthcare consumers. In areas of clinical uncertainty, for example, greater risk (or potential reward) might be attributed to websites where consumers might be more likely to avoid their provider's opinion about such information. For illustration purposes, in this exploratory study we examine web-based content within a longstanding area of uncertainty for consumers, the diagnosis and treatment of rheumatism. More refined analysis of web-based resources in such a specified, hierarchical domain can provide important clues related to the strategies of healthcare consumers.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management (IJHTM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook