DMAIC and DMADV – differences, similarities and synergies Online publication date: Sun, 09-Sep-2007
by Peter Cronemyr
International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage (IJSSCA), Vol. 3, No. 3, 2007
Abstract: Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve, Control (DMAIC) is the well-known Six Sigma methodology, while Define, Measure, Analyse, Design, Verify/Validate (DMADV) is the most commonly used methodology within Design for Six Sigma (DfSS). Many emphasise the differences between the two, but there are similarities as well. Based on Donald Wheeler's four process states, it is suggested when it is appropriate to use DMAIC or DMADV. However, in one specific state, which is quite common, neither of the two is appropriate. In the case of a process that is out of control but with only minor customer problems, a combination of DMAIC and DMADV, called for Define, Measure, Analyse, Design, Control (DMADC), is suggested. It was developed from experiences gained in process-improvement projects at Siemens in Sweden. Furthermore, contrary to the views of some authors, it is argued that there is no such thing as a 'five-sigma wall' between DMAIC and DfSS when improving processes.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage (IJSSCA):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook