'Hard' is 'soft': exploring the dangers of the 'hard'/'soft' distinction Online publication date: Fri, 01-Jun-2007
by Darren McCabe
International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management (IJISCM), Vol. 2, No. 1, 2007
Abstract: This paper argues that the hard/soft distinction used in relation to new management interventions is potentially dangerous because it serves to reproduce the status quo by reinforcing taken-for-granted assumptions about the world. Thus considering innovations to be 'hard' can result in a failure to think through the social implications of one's actions. It is suggested that our understanding of organisations can be enhanced through reflecting on the dichotomy and its underlying assumptions. It is thought that through such reflection, the number of innovations that are instigated with little thought for employees and their Quality of Working Life can be reduced, even though asymmetrical power relations are likely to remain. These issues are explored by drawing on some qualitative research from a company that introduced Statistical Process Control (SPC), which has been described as a 'hard' intervention, in conjunction with Total Quality Management (TQM).
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management (IJISCM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook