Valuing technology investments: use real options thinking but forget real options valuation Online publication date: Thu, 19-Apr-2007
by Paul R. Steffens, Evan J. Douglas
International Journal of Technoentrepreneurship (IJTE), Vol. 1, No. 1, 2007
Abstract: When facing risky technology investments or ventures 'real option thinking' – the managerial flexibility to capitalise on opportunities when they arise and/or to minimise the impact of threats – is precisely what is needed. Notwithstanding this, we argue Real Options Valuation (ROV) is inferior to traditional decision tree analysis for this context. Our reasoning is twofold. Firstly, ROV techniques provide a sophisticated treatment of market risks, but do not deal with firm-specific risks. However, the elevated risk facing technology ventures is predominantly firm-specific risk. Secondly, ROV has a severe practical limitation for new technology ventures. The starting point for ROV is to value the ''underlying asset'' – the venture/project in the absence of the 'real options' – using discounted cash flow techniques. But the risk profile/discount rate can not be established for this nonsensical hypothetical entity – because the 'real options' are an integral part of technology venture.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Technoentrepreneurship (IJTE):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook