Experiments in technology forcing: comparing the regulatory processes of US automobile safety and emissions regulations Online publication date: Wed, 31-Jan-2007
by David Gerard, Lester Lave
International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management (IJTPM), Vol. 7, No. 1, 2007
Abstract: Technology forcing is a strategy where a regulator mandates a standard that cannot be met with existing technology to internalise external costs associated with the production and/or use of a product. We argue that the implementation process for these policies has a pronounced effect on how regulations affect the development and diffusion of new technologies. To examine this proposition, we look at two case studies of technology forcing policies targeting US automakers: The 1969 Department of Transportation airbag mandate and the 1970 Clean Air Act emissions requirements for new vehicles by 1975. The results of these two mandates were quite different. EPA successfully forced the adoption of catalytic converters, while airbags did not become compulsory for nearly 20 years. We demonstrate that these results did not stem from differences in complexity or costs of adopting the technologies, but instead were a product of political and regulatory variables that influenced the implementation process.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management (IJTPM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook