Trading off risks and benefits when valuing new GM technologies: a consumer perspective Online publication date: Wed, 24-Jan-2007
by Maria L. Loureiro, Marcia Bugbee
International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology (IJARGE), Vol. 6, No. 1, 2007
Abstract: While Genetically Modified (GM) crops and foods are in production and on the shelves of supermarkets in many countries, they are still under much criticism and scrutiny around the world. Many studies report that consumers' perceptions towards biotechnology are mixed. The main contribution of this paper is to present a Contingent Valuation (CV) modelling approach that allows for the calculation of a net willingness to pay when both 'lovers' and 'haters' of these GM crops are considered. Willingness To Pay (WTP) is contrasted with Willingness To Accept (WTA) and a net WTP estimate is computed. Results suggest that not properly accounting for the existence of negative preferences may seriously bias the welfare estimates. These findings encourage policymakers to assess new technologies employing a framework of heterogeneous consumer preferences, including both, perceived benefits and perceived risks.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology (IJARGE):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook