Uncertainty in work motivation theory-building Online publication date: Mon, 15-Nov-2021
by Yundong Huang
International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy (IJMCP), Vol. 14, No. 3, 2021
Abstract: This article responds to Locke and Latham's (2004) masterpiece, "What should we do about motivation theory? Six recommendations for the twenty-first century." In their paper, Locke and Latham reviewed major motivation theories and emphasised motivation theory development's future direction, proposing six recommendations to build a more valid, more complete theory. Seventeen years later, however, the literature lacks this type of refined theory, and what has prevented its development remains unclear. This article discusses previous theory-building attempts' hidden assumptions. It is also the first article to point out sources of uncertainty that have prevented scholars' creation of an integrated work motivation theory in the way Locke and Latham proposed. Understanding such sources of uncertainty is important to theory-building; indeed, it is more important than proposing a new theory.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy (IJMCP):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com