The role of the evaluator in an interactive evaluation of cochlear implantation: shaping power, trust and deliberation Online publication date: Thu, 30-Nov-2006
by Rob Reuzel, John Grin, Tjitske Akkerman
International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy (IJFIP), Vol. 3, No. 1, 2007
Abstract: Interactive evaluation involves a deliberative procedure that has been designed to address poorly structured policy problems in the context of power differences between stakeholders. Basically, it consists of an iterative cycle of interviews with these stakeholders. Power differences are dealt with by anonymising the procedure, the researcher acting as a counsellor exchanging claims, concerns and issues between the stakeholders. However, now the researcher himself or herself becomes a powerful figure. This article describes how a researcher, in an interactive evaluation of pediatric Cochlear Implantation (CI), maintained a balance between constructively using his power to help tackle the policy problem and leaving the ownership of the deliberative process with the stakeholders. To some extent, the procedure was designed to this aim. However, success also critically depends on the researcher's skills in building trust and prudence in applying rules of argumentation.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy (IJFIP):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook