The precautionary principle and absolute liability Online publication date: Tue, 12-Sep-2006
by Miguel A. Santos
International Journal of Global Environmental Issues (IJGENVI), Vol. 6, No. 4, 2006
Abstract: Worldwide, the precautionary principle has been applied in various ways in the environmental decision-making process. Often the interpretation of the principle is based on absolute scientific certainty, cost-benefit analysis, or environmental equity. However, science cannot be absolute. Moreover, the resulting vagueness of the precautionary principle undermines the concept. To avoid these concerns, this paper proposes a two-stage interpretation of the precautionary principle. In the first stage, the scientific community has a rationale or educated idea that a certain substance might have serious and irreversible environmental or health consequences. Once this level of certainty is reached, those who stand to benefit from an activity should have the duty to prove that the activity will not cause undue harm. During the second stage, the alleged substance's guilt or non-toxicity must be established to a scientific certainty. If the substance is toxic, then the precautionary principle should mandate that absolute liability is the standard to be applied.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Global Environmental Issues (IJGENVI):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook