Public policy informatics: does better information produce better policy? Online publication date: Wed, 06-Sep-2006
by Michael Munger
International Journal of Public Policy (IJPP), Vol. 1, No. 4, 2006
Abstract: Collecting data is different from accumulating knowledge. To succeed, public affairs informatics must develop three infrastructures: 1) protocols for standardising which variables are meaningful and formats for records; 2) storage and retrieval hardware and rules that protect privacy and ensure access; 3) a scholarly interpretive community that can do basic research on patterns in the data, ensuring that policy advice derived from informatics is theory-driven rather than exclusively driven by short-term problems. Two problems with developing these infrastructures are outlined. The first problem is the competing, and often conflicting, sources of authority and legitimacy in public affairs (markets, experts, and politics). The consequence of this conflict is likely to prevent a consensus on protocols or development of infrastructure. The second problem is the boundary between private issues and collectively decided issues. This problem is related to privacy, and it affects the very legitimacy of public policy.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Public Policy (IJPP):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook