Can users infer missing information in conversational case-based reasoning: the effects of providing context Online publication date: Mon, 11-May-2020
by Romy Müller; Jan Hendrik Paap; Rica Bönsel
International Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics (IJHFE), Vol. 7, No. 1, 2020
Abstract: Fault diagnosis can be supported by conversational case-based reasoning, but case descriptions are often incomplete. However, users might be able to infer missing information when the system provides context information. We investigated how such information affects ratings, solution times, and learning. Using a simulated case-based reasoning system, participants could ask about the presence of symptoms to find out how well each case matched the current situation. The system answered with yes or no, simply stated that it did not know the answer, or provided three or 15 pieces of context information (suggesting similarity, dissimilarity, or including no relevant information). Only context suggesting similarity increased accuracy, while all types of context increased subjective certainty. The amount of context had little impact: a high amount decreased speed and learning, but much less than expected. Taken together, context information can be helpful, but performance outcomes depend on the type of context provided.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics (IJHFE):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook