Data mining misnomer nomenclature: myth or myopic based on its evolutional and trend analysis Online publication date: Fri, 27-Sep-2019
by Gebeyehu Belay Gebremeskel; Birhanu Hailu; Belete Biazen
International Journal of Knowledge Engineering and Data Mining (IJKEDM), Vol. 6, No. 3, 2019
Abstract: Data mining (DM) has tremendous advantages for analysing largescale data for different fields. However, it has also a remarkable naming or nomenclature problem. It lacks a standard definition, which needs to be consistent for researchers regardless of their research capability. Because of its loose definition, it means an exploration of massive data as different things to a different audience. If so, is it a myth or myopic nomenclature of DM misnomer? Therefore, in this study, we investigated the naming seductiveness, which gives a novel idea on how and why researchers need to be concerned of their new findings or artefacts' proper naming. What motivated the authors to undertake a deep investigation of the unleashed power of a sedulous naming to gain a clear insight and knowing the advantages of proper and standard naming for the final annotations is an interesting issue. The approach proofed by empirical analysis as the DM trends for future prospects.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Knowledge Engineering and Data Mining (IJKEDM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook