Evaluation of additive manufacturing technologies for dimensional and geometric accuracy Online publication date: Mon, 17-Dec-2018
by Abdulrahman Al-Ahmari; Mohammed Ashfaq; Syed Hammad Mian; Wadea Ameen
International Journal of Materials and Product Technology (IJMPT), Vol. 58, No. 2/3, 2019
Abstract: In spite of numerous benefits offered by additive manufacturing, their primary applications are limited to prototyping. A number of unresolved issues can be cited, which have curtailed their implementation. Among serious problems faced by AM are poor dimensional and geometric accuracy as well as low surface finish. Henceforth, further expansion and better performance entail an increased understanding of AM systems. A wide range of AM technologies, with variations in accuracy and surface finish is available in the market. Most often, the accuracy of AM machines do not persistently conform to the assertions of manufacturer, and thereby desired accuracy is difficult to attain. The goal of this work is to evaluate different AM processes. The most popular processes: fused deposition modelling (solid-based), stereolithography (liquid-based) and electron beam melting (powder-based) are evaluated. This study has been undertaken to provide engineers and designers with useful information about the expected accuracy from different AM systems.
Online publication date: Mon, 17-Dec-2018
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Materials and Product Technology (IJMPT):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email firstname.lastname@example.org