Rainwater tank analysis tools, climatic and spatial variability: a case study for Sydney Online publication date: Thu, 03-Aug-2017
by Monzur A. Imteaz; Muhammad Moniruzzaman; Md. Rezaul Karim
International Journal of Water (IJW), Vol. 11, No. 3, 2017
Abstract: This paper presents analyses from a recently developed daily water balance model (eTank), which calculates rainwater tank outcomes under three different climatic conditions (i.e., dry, average and wet years). For comparison, eTank calculated results were compared with two other continuous simulation type water balance models, CSWBM and 'Raintank Analyser'. It is found that CSWBM produced water savings and reliabilities significantly at variance with the eTank calculated water savings and reliabilities. However, it is shown that a widely used tool, 'Raintank Analyser', calculated water savings that closely match the eTank calculated water savings in an average year, which is reasonable and supports eTank's accuracy. Further, eTank was used to present expected climatic variations in water savings in Sydney, as well as expected spatial variations within the city.
Online publication date: Thu, 03-Aug-2017
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Water (IJW):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email email@example.com