Safety oriented bubble diagrams vs. risk plots based on prediction intervals and strength-of-knowledge assessments. Which one to use as an alternative to risk matrices? Online publication date: Wed, 03-Dec-2014
by Eirik Bjorheim Abrahamsen; Øystein Amundrud; Terje Aven; Alireza M. Gelyani
International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management (IJBCRM), Vol. 5, No. 3, 2014
Abstract: The use of risk matrices for visualising risks has been discussed in the literature. It is argued that risk matrices are not appropriate as the uncertainty is not properly taken into account. As an alternative to risk matrices, the use of bubble diagrams has been suggested. Risk plots based on prediction (uncertainty) intervals and strength-of-knowledge assessments have also been recommended. In this paper, we discuss which of these two alternatives to traditional risk matrices is considered most appropriate for visualising risks. We show that risk plots are more precise in reflecting important aspects of risks than bubble diagrams, while bubble diagrams are considered to give a better basis for ranking between risks. In this paper, a new visualisation tool closely related to the risk plots and the bubble diagrams is suggested.
Online publication date: Wed, 03-Dec-2014
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management (IJBCRM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email email@example.com