Two models for comparing decisional maps Online publication date: Mon, 06-May-2013
by S. Aimé Metchebon T.; Valérie Brison; Marc Pirlot
International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making (IJMCDM), Vol. 3, No. 2/3, 2013
Abstract: Among the many interesting decision problems raised by the use of geographic information systems, we address that of comparing maps representing the state of a given region at different stages of an evolution. We assume that the maps representing the state of the region are all partitioned in the same system of zones. Each zone is assessed on a discrete ordinal scale; the state of the region is described by the assessment of its zones. We analyse two models of preference on a set of maps of a region. The first only takes into account the frequency distribution of the zones of the region that belong to the various categories of the ordinal assessment scale. This model is a direct transposition of the expected utility model in decision under risk. Our second model takes into account not only the distribution of the zones but also one aspect related to their geographic location, namely the contiguity of the zones belonging to the same category. For both models, we develop procedures for eliciting the model's parameters and illustrate them on an example taken from a real world application.
Online publication date: Mon, 06-May-2013
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making (IJMCDM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email email@example.com