Expert judgement and re-elicitation for prion disease risk uncertainties Online publication date:: Wed, 29-Oct-2014
by Michael G. Tyshenko; Susie ElSaadany; Tamer Oraby; Shalu Darshan; Angela Catford; Willy Aspinall; Roger Cooke; Daniel Krewski
International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management (IJRAM), Vol. 16, No. 1/2/3, 2012
Abstract: Much uncertainty surrounds transmission of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) through blood and blood derived products. A first expert elicitation with 14 experts was conducted in March 2008, and a second re-elicitation involving 11 experts was held a year later in March 2009. Both expert groups were calibrated using a series of seed questions for which values are known, and then were asked to provide their individual judgements on a set of seven target questions for which values are not known or have not been determined through conventional research. Questions dealing with uncertainty of TSE prevalence, genotype effects, susceptibility, and infectivity were answered by the experts. Elicitation can be used to obtain quantitative values for parameters affecting prion uncertainty gaps. We show that the method is amenable to re-elicitation over time allowing refinement of expert opinion as new knowledge becomes available for improved risk assessments where data gaps continue to exist.
Online publication date:: Wed, 29-Oct-2014
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management (IJRAM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email email@example.com