A century of talks on research: what happened to development and production? Online publication date: Tue, 22-May-2012
by Benoit Godin; Joseph P. Lane
International Journal of Transitions and Innovation Systems (IJTIS), Vol. 2, No. 1, 2012
Abstract: For decades, research and development or R&D has dominated innovation policies. This paper considers the statistical categories supporting this representation. It argues that the acronym 'R&D' has weakened critical thinking and policies about innovation in Western nations. The categories 'research' and 'development' used to characterise innovation arose not to explain the underlying methods or mechanisms of innovation, but instead to satisfy the requirements of statistical analyses. The D became subsumed under the R in the acronym R&D and, at the same time and because of the subsuming precisely, it disappeared from view. Further, the supremacy of research in representations and public policies eliminated the consideration of a third critical element in achieving innovation: P for industrial production. The authors suggest a new category (RD&P) to remedy the deficiencies of present analyses.
Online publication date: Tue, 22-May-2012
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Transitions and Innovation Systems (IJTIS):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email firstname.lastname@example.org