Theory and evidence on mergers and acquisitions by small and medium enterprises Online publication date: Tue, 02-Aug-2011
by Utz Weitzel, Killian J. McCarthy
International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management (IJEIM), Vol. 14, No. 2/3, 2011
Abstract: The theory of mergers and acquisitions (M&As) has been developed almost exclusively from the study of large deals by large firms. In this paper, we argue that the behaviour and success of M&As by small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) may be significantly different. Accordingly, we revisit established M&A theories and develop a theoretical framework and several testable hypotheses, regarding the distinctive features of SME M&As. Our empirical results support our expectations and show that, compared to large firms, acquiring SMEs rely more intensively on external growth via M&As, are more likely to be withdrawn, suggesting that SMEs are more flexible and more able to avoid deals that turn sour. Finally, SME M&As are more likely to be financed with equity rather than debt, indicating that the influential financial pecking order theory is of less relevance to SMEs.
Online publication date: Tue, 02-Aug-2011
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management (IJEIM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email firstname.lastname@example.org