Cost-effective use of evaluation models: an empirical cross-national investigation Online publication date: Mon, 15-Dec-2003
by W. Martin de Jong
International Journal of Technology Management (IJTM), Vol. 19, No. 3/4/5, 2000
Abstract: Despite the existence of methodologically sound evaluation models for infrastructure projects, it is far from certain if these methods are used at all. In fact, political motives seem often to play a more important role when it comes to ''real decision-making''. This paper provides an answer to the question of why certain evaluation methods are used as the basis to allocate funds and others are not, even if they are qualitatively of high standing. The evaluation methods used in six different countries and corresponding authorities (France, Germany, Switzerland, Netherlands, UK and the MTC/Bay Area) have been analysed. As a result, seven explanatory factors which determine the effective use of appraisal methods have been derived: range of different criteria, understanding and dispersion, contributions of lower government tiers, contribution of pressure groups, agreement among actors on usage, flexibility of usage, and legal recognition. A country-specific discussion is carried out in terms of these seven factors. The paper closes with a cross-national comparison and practical considerations for successful implementation of evaluation methods.
Online publication date: Mon, 15-Dec-2003
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Technology Management (IJTM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email email@example.com