The full text of this article

 

An efficiency argument for the Basic Income Guarantee
by Karl Widerquist, Michael A. Lewis
International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment (IJEWE), Vol. 2, No. 1, 2006

 

Abstract: This paper argues that the US welfare system needs to move away from conditionality and toward a Basic Income Guarantee (BIG). It discusses the definition of poverty and the goal of poverty policy. It critically examines five theories of the causes of poverty: the physical inability to work, single parenthood, inadequate demand for labour, inadequate human capital, and a poor work ethic. It critically discusses six policy strategies for fighting poverty: promotion of economic growth, workfare, the minimum wage, separating the 'deserving' from the 'undeserving' poor, publicly guaranteed employment, and the Basic Income Guarantee. It assesses how well each of these programmes addresses the five proposed causes of poverty, making the case that the most efficient and effective of these is the Basic Income Guarantee.

 

is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 

Existing subscribers:

Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the full text.

 

Pay per view:

If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

 
Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment (IJEWE):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

 

    Username:        Password:         

Forgotten your password?


 

Want to subscribe?

A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

 

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com