Title: A comparison of digital and conventional sketching: implications for conceptual design ideation

Authors: James Self; Mark Evans; Eun Jin Kim

Addresses: School of Design and Human Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), 50-UNIST gil, Ulsan, 689-798, Korea ' Loughborough Design School, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK ' Department of Industrial Design Korean Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 291 Daehak-ro, Daejeon, 34141, Korea

Abstract: The study compared the use of digital and conventional sketching as influence upon conceptual design work. The results show a significantly increased focus of attention upon the sketching tool in the digital condition compared to conventional sketching with pen and paper. Both a statistical analysis and fine-grained qualitative comparison illustrate how increased frequencies of sketching tool focused activities resulted in both significantly more time spent in problem orientated work and the fragmentation of attempts to transition from problem definition to generative solution ideation. In contrast, reduced tool-focused activity in the conventional sketching condition appeared to provide opportunities for significantly increased solution ideation through design-driven moves to explore, reflect upon and develop solution propositions. The implications of a tool orientated focus of attention are discussed in terms of its impact upon reflective solution ideation during conceptual design.

Keywords: design activity; design sketching; reflective practice; conceptual design ideation; design representation; design research framework; digital sketching.

DOI: 10.1504/JDR.2016.077028

Journal of Design Research, 2016 Vol.14 No.2, pp.171 - 202

Received: 17 Apr 2015
Accepted: 09 Mar 2016
Published online: 17 Jun 2016 *

Full-text access for editors Full-text access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article