Title: Can alternative car fuels reduce greenhouse gas emissions?

Authors: P. Moriarty

Addresses: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Monash University, Caulfield Campus, PO Box 197, Caulfield East, 3145, Australia

Abstract: There has been controversy in the published literature regarding the scope for alternative fuels to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in passenger transport. This paper aims to resolve this question in an Australian context, and, where possible, to calculate the costs of emission reductions. Fossil-fuel-based alternatives give either marginal or uncertain reductions. Ethanol from sugar cane, the most promising biomass fuel, has high costs per tonne of CO2 reduction, and, when other trace gases are considered, shows no definite improvement over petrol. Electric vehicles, if deployed today in Australia, would exacerbate greenhouse warming. Only if an alternative new energy source such as wind power generated 15% or more of total electricity would emission reductions occur compared to equivalent petrol-fuelled cars.

Keywords: alternative fuels; biomass fuels; CO2; CH4; electric vehicles; greenhouse gases; GHG emissions; N2O; natural gas; carbon dioxide; methane; nitrous oxide; ethanol; Australia.

DOI: 10.1504/IJVD.1994.061901

International Journal of Vehicle Design, 1994 Vol.15 No.1/2, pp.1 - 7

Published online: 28 May 2014 *

Full-text access for editors Full-text access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article