Title: Risk-benefit-cost prioritisation of independent protection layers for a liquefied natural gas terminal

Authors: Lauro J. Martinez; James H. Lambert

Addresses: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia, Mexico City, Mexico; Department of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Virginia, 151 Engineer's Way 112 Olson Hall, P.O. Box 400736 Charlottesville, VA 22904-4736, USA. ' Department of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Virginia, 112 Olsson Hall, P.O. Box 400747, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904, USA

Abstract: Liquefied natural gas (LNG) operations and facilities are growing in scale and number in many countries driven by the key role of natural gas for increasing regional and local energy security, particularly for electric power generation. While the industry has achieved remarkably high levels of safety, the reduction of residual risks associated with the unloading, storage and distribution in LNG terminals continues to be a top priority. This paper develops a risk benefit cost framework to support facilities planners in the selection and prioritisation of independent protection layers (IPLs), which are identified by an existing commonly adopted methodology known as layer of protection analysis (LOPA). Six incident scenarios are used to analyse and compare feasible process and equipment configurations that correspond to several IPLs. A benefit and cost comparison of the IPLs is made based on estimates of the potential reductions of the facility unavailability and the annualised costs of implementation. A tutorial example suggests how LNG facility managers would use the developed framework beyond the typical LOPA analysis to select and prioritise IPLs and other risk reduction activities.

Keywords: risk-benefit-cost analysis; process hazard analysis; layer of protection analysis; LOPA; unavailability factor; system safety; multicriteria decision analysis; MCDA; energy security; liquefied natural gas; LNG terminals; risk assessment; risk reduction; cost benefit analysis; critical infrastructures.

DOI: 10.1504/IJCIS.2012.050106

International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, 2012 Vol.8 No.4, pp.306 - 325

Accepted: 14 Jun 2012
Published online: 31 Jul 2014 *

Full-text access for editors Full-text access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article