Title: Learning where it counts: an ecological argument for online education

Authors: Brent Fonville; Rick Dale

Addresses: University of Memphis, 439 Psychology Building, Memphis, TN 38152, USA. ' University of Memphis, 439 Psychology Building, Memphis, TN 38152, USA

Abstract: The implementation of learning technologies for online instruction and relevant testing raises issues concerning the ready availability and use of external reference materials that students may consult during evaluation but are not commonly found in in-class courses, such as the internet, class notes, and so on. Yet, the presence of such materials may be ecologically valid with respect to daily cognitive performance in any domain (e.g., reasoning and decision-making in everyday life). This paper reviews three related theories of cognitive science as they argue for an integrative cognitive system that includes external artefacts, and thus go beyond |internal| processes as the sole purveyors of cognition. The paper then uses these theories to frame an argument that the use of online learning technologies could be considerably more ecologically valid than in-class testing based on this integrated external cognitive approach. The paper ends with some suggestions on improving online testing and increasing its ecological validity by embracing the view that cognition extends beyond the brain.

Keywords: ecological validity; external cognition; online testing; e-learning; electronic learning; online education; ecology; online instruction; reference materials; student evaluation; in-class courses; class notes; internet; world wide web; cognitive performance; reasoning; decision-making; universities; colleges; higher education; USA; United States; everyday life; cognitive science; integrative cognitive systems; external artefacts; internal processes; brain; learning technology.

DOI: 10.1504/IJLT.2011.043579

International Journal of Learning Technology, 2011 Vol.6 No.3, pp.251 - 262

Published online: 20 Oct 2014 *

Full-text access for editors Full-text access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article