Burial, cremation or transplantation? Reflections on legal and ethical problems in the framework of civil law doctrine Online publication date: Fri, 22-Apr-2016
by Konstantinos N. Christodoulou
International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies (IJHRCS), Vol. 4, No. 1, 2016
Abstract: In the Greek legal order, although only the absence of opposition of the deceased is required for his cremation and transplantation, the consent of his relatives is additionally called for, as if power over his body now belongs to them. In this sense, it could be argued that with regard to the legal fate of the corpse there is another case of (quasi-) succession causa mortis. From this basis of analogy arises the issue of the application of provisions of the law of inheritance mutatis mutandis in this instance (the disposal of the corpse). In this framework, the consent of the deceased shall be subject (directly or by analogy) to the legal status of a will (e.g. formality, revocability, defects, etc.); the relatives, to whom the law leaves the matter should be treated as intestate quasi-successors. Their disputes shall be solved via interim measures, although the decision would most probably exhaust the object in the case.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies (IJHRCS):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook