Can discounting be justified?
by Dieter Birnbacher
International Journal of Sustainable Development (IJSD), Vol. 6, No. 1, 2003

Abstract: Discounting is a problem because of the striking discrepancy between, on the one hand, its impact on the results of economic cost–benefit analyses and, in consequence, on economic and political planning, and, on the other, its doubtful rational and moral justification. Starting from the diagnosis that the controversy about discounting suffers from considerable intransparency, the paper makes an attempt to structure the debate by distinguishing four main types of discounting and by assessing the philosophical merits and demerits of the arguments on both sides. While utility discounting is criticised, on a principle level, with arguments familiar from the philosophical tradition from Epicurus to Parfit, it is cautiously defended, on a consequentialist line of reasoning, as a pragmatic option suited to a world of limited altruism.

Online publication date: Mon, 10-May-2004

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Sustainable Development (IJSD):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

Username:        Password:          Forgotten your password?

Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com