Achieving innovation or the Holy Grail: managing knowledge or managing commitment? Online publication date: Tue, 08-Jul-2003
by John Waters
International Journal of Technology Management (IJTM), Vol. 20, No. 5/6/7/8, 2000
Abstract: Recent literature asserts that knowledge is the source of innovation and, consequently, that knowledge management is a key to innovation management. However, the literature is not informative about how knowledge actually leads to innovation. Knowledge that is no more than a potential for action cannot explain the acquisition and use of knowledge in innovation. This paper argues that achieving innovation, like the search for the Holy Grail, is primarily about generating commitments. This contention is supported by analysis of the role of commitment to innovation from both strategic and internal process viewpoints, and by presenting the elements of a theory of commitment to innovation. The paper supports the view that descriptions of innovation from within the psychological and organisational processes of organisations can be as valid as those that rely on objectified forms of knowledge.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Technology Management (IJTM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com