Definitional imprecisions in strategic and non-strategic Corporate Social Responsibility Online publication date: Fri, 14-Nov-2008
by Glen Kurokawa, Darryl R.J. Macer
International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy (IJMCP), Vol. 3, No. 2, 2008
Abstract: A fundamental tension between strategic and non-strategic Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) exists. The former is about CSR for profit-maximisation while the latter is independent of profit. Given, the intensity of discourse and dialogue underway regarding CSR the distinction between these two classes of CSR needs to be more precisely defined. Well-founded consensus is harder to build, whether in academia, the business world or the rest of society, the less informed are the decisions made regarding CSR. This article argues that the debate between strategic and non-strategic CSR suffers from significant definitional problems that plague discussion and debate involving CSR which involve the terms 'social benefit' and 'profit'. These are addressed through a perspective that incorporates these definitional uncertainties. The latter leads to several prescriptions: increased awareness of imprecision, more case-study approaches for CSR and increased empirical understanding of definitional imprecisions.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy (IJMCP):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook