EU cohesion policy: the debate on Structural Funds
by John Bradley
International Journal of Public Policy (IJPP), Vol. 3, No. 3/4, 2008

Abstract: After 15 years of EU cohesion policy, implemented through National Development Plans (NDPs) and Structural Funds (SFs), economists remain divided on interpretations of policy effectiveness. As new member states prepare for the next programme of EU cohesion aid, it is important to review this debate. Two contrasting empirical approaches are distinguished: 'testing' and 'impact quantification'. We examine views of participants in the debate, and the methodologies and tools of economic analysis that are commonly used to support different conclusions. Having surveyed current methodologies, we conclude that none of them are likely to provide a decisive resolution to the debate.

Online publication date: Sat, 28-Jun-2008

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Public Policy (IJPP):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

    Username:        Password:         

Forgotten your password?


Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com