<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">
<channel rdf:about="http://www.inderscience.com/current_issue_rss/index.php?journal=ijiq">
<title>Most recent issue published online for the International Journal of Information Quality.</title>
<description>International Journal of Information Quality</description>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=204&amp;year=2011&amp;vol=2&amp;issue=4</link>
<dc:publisher>Inderscience Publishers Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:language>en-uk</dc:language>
<prism:publicationName>International Journal of Information Quality</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1751-0457</prism:issn>
<prism:eIssn>1751-0465</prism:eIssn>
<prism:copyright>&#169; 2011 Inderscience Publishers Ltd</prism:copyright>
<prism:rightsAgent>editor@inderscience.com</prism:rightsAgent>
<image rdf:resource="https://www.inderscience.com/images/files/coverImgs/ijiq_scoverijiq.jpg" />
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJIQ.2011.043779" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJIQ.2011.043780" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJIQ.2011.043784" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJIQ.2011.043782" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJIQ.2011.043783" />
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>
<image rdf:about="https://www.inderscience.com/images/files/coverImgs/ijiq_scoverijiq.jpg">
<title>International Journal of Information Quality</title>
<url>https://www.inderscience.com/images/files/coverImgs/ijiq_scoverijiq.jpg</url>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=204&amp;year=2011&amp;vol=2&amp;issue=4</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJIQ.2011.043779">
<title>An examination of the information quality perceptions of Mexican internet users</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43779</link>
<description>Mexico was a relatively early adopter of the internet, and although broadband access has been limited in some parts of the country, the government has aggressively sought to provide internet access to users throughout the country. This study reports the results of a study of perceptions of information quality among Mexican users of the internet. Results are reported from a survey of internet users at two Mexican universities in which perceptions of 15 dimensions of information quality are assessed. The nine dimensions of believability, accuracy, objectivity, reputation, value&#45;added, ease of understanding, representational consistency, concise representation, and access security have higher ratings for traditional text sources of information than for internet sources of information. In contrast, the dimensions of timeliness and accessibility have higher ratings for internet sources than for traditional text sources of information.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43779"><b>An examination of the information quality perceptions of Mexican internet users</b></A><br />Barbara D. Klein; Magali Valero; Yi Maggie Guo<br /><i>International Journal of Information Quality, Vol. 2, No. 4 (2011) pp. 287 - 299</i><br />Mexico was a relatively early adopter of the internet, and although broadband access has been limited in some parts of the country, the government has aggressively sought to provide internet access to users throughout the country. This study reports the results of a study of perceptions of information quality among Mexican users of the internet. Results are reported from a survey of internet users at two Mexican universities in which perceptions of 15 dimensions of information quality are assessed. The nine dimensions of believability, accuracy, objectivity, reputation, value&#45;added, ease of understanding, representational consistency, concise representation, and access security have higher ratings for traditional text sources of information than for internet sources of information. In contrast, the dimensions of timeliness and accessibility have higher ratings for internet sources than for traditional text sources of information.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJIQ.2011.043779</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Information Quality, Vol. 2, No. 4 (2011) pp. 287 - 299</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Barbara D. Klein; Magali Valero; Yi Maggie Guo</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>University of Michigan&#45;Dearborn, 19000 Hubbard Drive, Dearborn, MI 48126 USA. &#39; University of Michigan&#45;Dearborn, 19000 Hubbard Drive, Dearborn, MI 48126 USA. &#39; University of Michigan&#45;Dearborn, 19000 Hubbard Drive, Dearborn, MI 48126 USA</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>information quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>internet sources</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>information sources</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mexican end users</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mexico</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>perceived quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>higher education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>text sources.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-11-22T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>287</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>299</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-22T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJIQ.2011.043780">
<title>Assessment and analysis of information quality&#58; a multidimensional model and case studies</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43780</link>
<description>Information quality is a complex and multidimensional notion. In the context of information system engineering, it is also a transversal notion and to be fully understood, it needs to be evaluated jointly considering the quality of data, the quality of the underlying conceptual data model and the quality of the software system that manages these data. This paper presents a multidimensional model for exploring information in a multidimensional way, which aids in the navigation, filtering, and interpretation of quality measures, and thus in the identification of the most appropriate actions to improve information quality. Two application scenarios are presented to illustrate and validate the multidimensional approach&#58; the first one concerns the quality of customer information at Electricit&#233; de France, a French electricity company, and the second concerns the quality of patient records at Institut Curie, a well&#45;known medical institute in France. The instantiation of our multidimensional model in these contexts shows first illustrations of its applicability.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43780"><b>Assessment and analysis of information quality&#58; a multidimensional model and case studies</b></A><br />Laure Berti&#45;&#201;quille; Isabelle Comyn&#45;Wattiau; Mireille Cosquer; Zoubida Kedad; Sylvaine Nugier; Ver&#243;nika Peralta; Samira Si&#45;Sa&#239;d Cherfi; Virginie Thion&#45;Goasdou&#233;<br /><i>International Journal of Information Quality, Vol. 2, No. 4 (2011) pp. 300 - 323</i><br />Information quality is a complex and multidimensional notion. In the context of information system engineering, it is also a transversal notion and to be fully understood, it needs to be evaluated jointly considering the quality of data, the quality of the underlying conceptual data model and the quality of the software system that manages these data. This paper presents a multidimensional model for exploring information in a multidimensional way, which aids in the navigation, filtering, and interpretation of quality measures, and thus in the identification of the most appropriate actions to improve information quality. Two application scenarios are presented to illustrate and validate the multidimensional approach&#58; the first one concerns the quality of customer information at Electricit&#233; de France, a French electricity company, and the second concerns the quality of patient records at Institut Curie, a well&#45;known medical institute in France. The instantiation of our multidimensional model in these contexts shows first illustrations of its applicability.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJIQ.2011.043780</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Information Quality, Vol. 2, No. 4 (2011) pp. 300 - 323</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Laure Berti&#45;&#201;quille; Isabelle Comyn&#45;Wattiau; Mireille Cosquer; Zoubida Kedad; Sylvaine Nugier; Ver&#243;nika Peralta; Samira Si&#45;Sa&#239;d Cherfi; Virginie Thion&#45;Goasdou&#233;</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>CEREGE&#45;IRD, Europ&#244;le M&#233;diterran&#233;en de l&#39;Arbois, Av. L. Philibert, BP 80, 13545 Aix&#45;En&#45;Provence, France. &#39; CEDRIC, Conservatoire National des Arts et M&#233;tiers &#40;CNAM&#41; et ESSEC Business School, 292 Rue Saint Martin, 75141 Paris Cedex 03, Paris, France. &#39; Service d&#39;Information M&#233;dicale, Institut Curie, 26, Rue des Foss&#233;s Saint&#45;Jacques, 75005 Paris, France. &#39; Laboratoire PRiSM, Universit&#233; de Versailles Saint&#45;Quentin&#45;en&#45;Yvelines, 45 Avenue des Etats&#45;Unis, 78035 Versailles Cedex, France. &#39; EDF   R&amp;D, D&#233;partement STEP, 6 Quai Watier, BP 49, 78401 Chatou Cedex, France. &#39; Antenne Universitaire de Blois, 3 Place Jean Jaur&#232;s, 41000 Blois, France. &#39; CEDRIC, Conservatoire National des Arts et M&#233;tiers &#40;CNAM&#41;, 292 Rue Saint Martin, 75141 Paris Cedex 03, Paris, France. &#39; CEDRIC, Conservatoire National des Arts et M&#233;tiers &#40;CNAM&#41;, 292 Rue Saint Martin, 75141 Paris Cedex 03, Paris, France</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>information quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>model quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>data quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>quality analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>quality measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>customer information</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>patient records</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>patient information.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-11-22T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>300</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>323</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-22T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJIQ.2011.043784">
<title>Information quality on the World Wide Web&#58; development of a framework</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43784</link>
<description>Data consumers are provided with easy online access to information on the World Wide Web. However, consumers face information quality problems in their quest for information. This paper focuses on the development of an instrument to measure information quality &#40;IQ&#41; on the World Wide Web from a user&#39;s perspective. Based on a comprehensive review of the literature, 20 important IQ frameworks were identified. These models, though varied in their approach and application, share a number of characteristics regarding their classifications of the attributes of quality. The paper identifies common dimensions that exist across the existing IQ frameworks in the literature and develops a unified comprehensive framework for the measurement of IQ based on the identified thread of commonality and the intuitive approach. A survey instrument was developed and fine&#45;tuned using the iterative cognitive interview process. The proposed survey instrument comprises 72 questions to measure 22 IQ dimensions.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43784"><b>Information quality on the World Wide Web&#58; development of a framework</b></A><br />Jaikrit Kandari; Erick C. Jones; Fiona Fui&#45;Hoon Nah; Ram R. Bishu<br /><i>International Journal of Information Quality, Vol. 2, No. 4 (2011) pp. 324 - 343</i><br />Data consumers are provided with easy online access to information on the World Wide Web. However, consumers face information quality problems in their quest for information. This paper focuses on the development of an instrument to measure information quality &#40;IQ&#41; on the World Wide Web from a user&#39;s perspective. Based on a comprehensive review of the literature, 20 important IQ frameworks were identified. These models, though varied in their approach and application, share a number of characteristics regarding their classifications of the attributes of quality. The paper identifies common dimensions that exist across the existing IQ frameworks in the literature and develops a unified comprehensive framework for the measurement of IQ based on the identified thread of commonality and the intuitive approach. A survey instrument was developed and fine&#45;tuned using the iterative cognitive interview process. The proposed survey instrument comprises 72 questions to measure 22 IQ dimensions.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJIQ.2011.043784</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Information Quality, Vol. 2, No. 4 (2011) pp. 324 - 343</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Jaikrit Kandari; Erick C. Jones; Fiona Fui&#45;Hoon Nah; Ram R. Bishu</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>The Department of Industrial and Management Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska, 328 NH Lincoln NE 68588&#45;0518, Lincoln, USA. &#39; The Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, The University of Texas at Arlington, Woolf Hall, Room 420, 500 West First Street, Arlington, TX 76019, USA. &#39; Department of Management, University of Nebraska, CBA 267, P.O. Box 880491, Lincoln, NE 68588&#45;0491, USA. &#39; University of Nebraska, Work 328 NH Lincoln NE 68588&#45;0518, USA</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>information quality frameworks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>survey instrument</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>internet</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>world wide web</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>WWW</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>quality measurement.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-11-22T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>324</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>343</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-22T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJIQ.2011.043782">
<title>Assessment of quality of data warehouse multidimensional model</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43782</link>
<description>Data warehouses are large repositories designed to enable the knowledge workers to take better and faster decisions. Due to its significance in strategic decisions, there is a need to assure data warehouse quality. One of the factors affecting the data warehouse quality is multidimensional model quality. Although there are some useful guidelines for designing good multidimensional data models, but objective indicators, i.e., metrics are needed to help designers to develop quality multidimensional models. Few researchers have proposed quality metrics for multidimensional models for data warehouse. These metrics need to be theoretically as well as empirically validated in order to prove their practical utility. In this paper, empirical validation using controlled experiment is carried out. We not only evaluate the effect of individual metric but also evaluate the effect of various combinations of metrics on data warehouse model quality specifically understandability, in order to best explain the variance of dependent variable due to independent variables. The results show that these metrics may be used as objective indicators for understandability. Finally, accuracy of our model in predicting the multidimensional model quality is also evaluated.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43782"><b>Assessment of quality of data warehouse multidimensional model</b></A><br />Anjana Gosain; Sangeeta Sabharwal; Sushama Nagpal<br /><i>International Journal of Information Quality, Vol. 2, No. 4 (2011) pp. 344 - 358</i><br />Data warehouses are large repositories designed to enable the knowledge workers to take better and faster decisions. Due to its significance in strategic decisions, there is a need to assure data warehouse quality. One of the factors affecting the data warehouse quality is multidimensional model quality. Although there are some useful guidelines for designing good multidimensional data models, but objective indicators, i.e., metrics are needed to help designers to develop quality multidimensional models. Few researchers have proposed quality metrics for multidimensional models for data warehouse. These metrics need to be theoretically as well as empirically validated in order to prove their practical utility. In this paper, empirical validation using controlled experiment is carried out. We not only evaluate the effect of individual metric but also evaluate the effect of various combinations of metrics on data warehouse model quality specifically understandability, in order to best explain the variance of dependent variable due to independent variables. The results show that these metrics may be used as objective indicators for understandability. Finally, accuracy of our model in predicting the multidimensional model quality is also evaluated.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJIQ.2011.043782</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Information Quality, Vol. 2, No. 4 (2011) pp. 344 - 358</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Anjana Gosain; Sangeeta Sabharwal; Sushama Nagpal</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>University School of Information Technology, GGSIPU, New Delhi&#45;110006, India. &#39; Computer Engineering Division, Netaji Subhas Institute of Technology, Dwarka, New Delhi&#45;110078, India. &#39; Computer Engineering Division, Netaji Subhas Institute of Technology, Dwarka, New Delhi&#45;110078, India</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>data warehouses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>multidimensional models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>metrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>empirical validation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>data warehouse quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>information quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>model quality.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-11-22T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>344</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>358</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-22T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJIQ.2011.043783">
<title>Trust and information quality&#58; performance gap analysis</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43783</link>
<description>This research considers information quality from the perspective of the dimensions of trust. This paper identifies 12 effective factors of information quality. These factors are investigated in order to gauge the gap between expected importance and perceived performance ratings of these factors within the process of information sharing. The research presents results of a survey comprising 39 organisations. Data analysis recognises four factors with critical gaps affecting information sharing. These are &#39;level of responsiveness&#39;, &#39;information accessibility&#39;, &#39;information accuracy&#39; and &#39;information timely as agreed&#39;.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43783"><b>Trust and information quality&#58; performance gap analysis</b></A><br />Latif Al&#45;Hakim<br /><i>International Journal of Information Quality, Vol. 2, No. 4 (2011) pp. 359 - 372</i><br />This research considers information quality from the perspective of the dimensions of trust. This paper identifies 12 effective factors of information quality. These factors are investigated in order to gauge the gap between expected importance and perceived performance ratings of these factors within the process of information sharing. The research presents results of a survey comprising 39 organisations. Data analysis recognises four factors with critical gaps affecting information sharing. These are &#39;level of responsiveness&#39;, &#39;information accessibility&#39;, &#39;information accuracy&#39; and &#39;information timely as agreed&#39;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJIQ.2011.043783</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Information Quality, Vol. 2, No. 4 (2011) pp. 359 - 372</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Latif Al&#45;Hakim</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Faculty of Business and Law, University of Southern Queensland, Queensland, 4350, Australia</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>information quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>information sharing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>trust dimensions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>gap analysis.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-11-22T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>359</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>372</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-22T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>

