<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">
<channel rdf:about="http://www.inderscience.com/current_issue_rss/index.php?journal=ijiie">
<title>Most recent issue published online for the International Journal of Innovation in Education.</title>
<description>International Journal of Innovation in Education</description>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=334&amp;year=2011&amp;vol=1&amp;issue=3</link>
<dc:publisher>Inderscience Publishers Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:language>en-uk</dc:language>
<prism:publicationName>International Journal of Innovation in Education</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1755-151X</prism:issn>
<prism:eIssn>1755-1528</prism:eIssn>
<prism:copyright>&#169; 2011 Inderscience Publishers Ltd</prism:copyright>
<prism:rightsAgent>editor@inderscience.com</prism:rightsAgent>
<image rdf:resource="https://www.inderscience.com/images/files/coverImgs/ijiie_scoverijiie.jpg" />
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJIIE.2011.045083" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJIIE.2011.045086" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJIIE.2011.045087" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJIIE.2011.045088" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJIIE.2011.045089" />
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>
<image rdf:about="https://www.inderscience.com/images/files/coverImgs/ijiie_scoverijiie.jpg">
<title>International Journal of Innovation in Education</title>
<url>https://www.inderscience.com/images/files/coverImgs/ijiie_scoverijiie.jpg</url>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=334&amp;year=2011&amp;vol=1&amp;issue=3</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJIIE.2011.045083">
<title>Educational simulation and gaming&#58; interactivity perspective</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=45083</link>
<description>This paper investigates simulation and gaming technologies in relation to the &#39;interactivity&#39; and &#39;learning interaction&#39; concepts. This paper reviews literature in the fields of educational simulation and gaming &#40;ESG&#41; and human&#45;computer interaction. It particularly focuses on the commonalities between ESG and the interactivity notion. It explores the rationale behind using simulation and gaming for education and looks at different factors that may affect the planning and design decisions including, learning goals and levels, types and modes of learning interactions, levels of interactivity and guidelines, individual differences and pedagogical aspects. The investigation shows close linkage between ESG and core interactivity factors in relation to interactive learning systems design. This paper concludes with recommendations and reflection on future research in the area of ESG.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=45083"><b>Educational simulation and gaming&#58; interactivity perspective</b></A><br />Khaled Sabry<br /><i>International Journal of Innovation in Education, Vol. 1, No. 3 (2011) pp. 229 - 245</i><br />This paper investigates simulation and gaming technologies in relation to the &#39;interactivity&#39; and &#39;learning interaction&#39; concepts. This paper reviews literature in the fields of educational simulation and gaming &#40;ESG&#41; and human&#45;computer interaction. It particularly focuses on the commonalities between ESG and the interactivity notion. It explores the rationale behind using simulation and gaming for education and looks at different factors that may affect the planning and design decisions including, learning goals and levels, types and modes of learning interactions, levels of interactivity and guidelines, individual differences and pedagogical aspects. The investigation shows close linkage between ESG and core interactivity factors in relation to interactive learning systems design. This paper concludes with recommendations and reflection on future research in the area of ESG.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJIIE.2011.045083</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Innovation in Education, Vol. 1, No. 3 (2011) pp. 229 - 245</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Khaled Sabry</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Hamdan Bin Mohammed e&#45;University, P.O. Box 71400, Dubai, UAE</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>educational simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>gaming technologies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>interactivity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>learning interactions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>design principles</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>human&#45;computer interaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>planning decisions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>design decisions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>learning goals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>learning levels</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>guidelines</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>individual differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>pedagogical factors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>pedagogy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>interactive learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>education.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2012-01-24T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>229</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>245</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-24T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJIIE.2011.045086">
<title>An effective pedagogical practice for teaching and assessing in engineering studies</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=45086</link>
<description>A great quantity of subjects taught in engineering studies seems to be difficult and immaterial from students&#39; perspective. On the contrary these core courses are highly vital to get a clear insight of the essentials in engineering discipline. Unfortunately, in many places and especially in developing countries like India, the ratio of teacher to student is not maintained. As is proved by studies, students prefer to collaborate and use internet for managing difficult course work. The impact of teacher is smaller than expected. This paper suggests a methodology which can generate awareness and importance for a given course, besides increasing confidence for a given subject, in students&#39; community. The method when implemented was also found to improve exam performance of students by 12&#8211;15&#37;. Moreover, the method was also observed to reduce the work load of teaching faculty, without compromising with the students&#39; knowledge imparting goal of the teaching institute or teacher. It also enhanced conviction of students towards evaluation technique, in addition to raising their interest in concerned subject. Besides the teacher was also contended as it helped to carry out the evaluation process more smoothly.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=45086"><b>An effective pedagogical practice for teaching and assessing in engineering studies</b></A><br />Nikita Desai<br /><i>International Journal of Innovation in Education, Vol. 1, No. 3 (2011) pp. 246 - 252</i><br />A great quantity of subjects taught in engineering studies seems to be difficult and immaterial from students&#39; perspective. On the contrary these core courses are highly vital to get a clear insight of the essentials in engineering discipline. Unfortunately, in many places and especially in developing countries like India, the ratio of teacher to student is not maintained. As is proved by studies, students prefer to collaborate and use internet for managing difficult course work. The impact of teacher is smaller than expected. This paper suggests a methodology which can generate awareness and importance for a given course, besides increasing confidence for a given subject, in students&#39; community. The method when implemented was also found to improve exam performance of students by 12&#8211;15&#37;. Moreover, the method was also observed to reduce the work load of teaching faculty, without compromising with the students&#39; knowledge imparting goal of the teaching institute or teacher. It also enhanced conviction of students towards evaluation technique, in addition to raising their interest in concerned subject. Besides the teacher was also contended as it helped to carry out the evaluation process more smoothly.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJIIE.2011.045086</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Innovation in Education, Vol. 1, No. 3 (2011) pp. 246 - 252</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Nikita Desai</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Information Technology Department, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad 387 001, Gujarat, India</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>stress free evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>unbiased evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>useful learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>evaluation methodologies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>pedagogical practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>pedagogy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>engineering studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>student perspectives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>core courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>developing countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>India</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>teacher&#45;student ratios</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>student collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>world wide web</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>internet</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>course work</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>course awareness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>student confidence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>performance improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>student performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>workloads</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>teaching faculties</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>higher education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>universities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>innovation.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2012-01-24T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>246</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>252</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-24T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJIIE.2011.045087">
<title>How school middle leaders in Singapore understand and practise &#39;innovation in education&#39;</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=45087</link>
<description>This paper presents the results of a research into how school middle leaders in Singapore understand and practise &#39;innovation in education&#39;. According to the research findings, these middle leaders felt that while &#39;innovation in education&#39; was hard to define, it should appeal to the &#39;common&#45;sense&#39; of educators and have real educational value. They also indicated that the practice of &#39;innovation in education&#39; should be mainly targeted at curriculum, teaching and learning, and involved them &#39;leading by example&#39;. The challenges of &#39;innovation in education&#39; involved a balance between educational ideals and school realities, which was not easy to achieve.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=45087"><b>How school middle leaders in Singapore understand and practise &#39;innovation in education&#39;</b></A><br />Pak Tee Ng<br /><i>International Journal of Innovation in Education, Vol. 1, No. 3 (2011) pp. 253 - 262</i><br />This paper presents the results of a research into how school middle leaders in Singapore understand and practise &#39;innovation in education&#39;. According to the research findings, these middle leaders felt that while &#39;innovation in education&#39; was hard to define, it should appeal to the &#39;common&#45;sense&#39; of educators and have real educational value. They also indicated that the practice of &#39;innovation in education&#39; should be mainly targeted at curriculum, teaching and learning, and involved them &#39;leading by example&#39;. The challenges of &#39;innovation in education&#39; involved a balance between educational ideals and school realities, which was not easy to achieve.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJIIE.2011.045087</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Innovation in Education, Vol. 1, No. 3 (2011) pp. 253 - 262</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Pak Tee Ng</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, 1, Nanyang Walk, Singapore 637616, Republic of Singapore</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>Singapore</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>school leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>middle leaders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>pedagogy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>common sense</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>educators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>educational value</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>leading by example</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>educational ideals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>school realities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>education.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2012-01-24T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>253</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>262</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-24T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJIIE.2011.045088">
<title>Interactive learning projects for schools with Web 2.0 tools</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=45088</link>
<description>Web 2.0 has increasingly been adopted in education, but the varying approaches of girls and boys towards new technologies have found little consideration in pedagogical contexts. The research project &#39;female&#39; is devoted to this theme&#58; fe&#47;male places Web 2.0 technologies in education at centre stage. These technologies are analysed under the aspect of gender and also in relationship to their didactical deployment. This is based on the assumption that Web 2.0 technologies, which comprises core ideas of the web &#40;user&#45;friendliness, standardisation, participation and reutilisation&#41; will increasingly gain importance and function as the &#39;passage point&#39; for technology&#8211;gender&#8211;discourses. Within the fe&#47;male project nine Web 2.0 school projects &#40;covering fields such as mathematics, biology, chemistry, physics and history&#41; were implemented in schools and evaluated. The main results display that between the girls and boys who participated in the evaluations much more similarities were observable than differences. Furthermore, a tendency is observable, that girls even profit more from Web 2.0 school projects than boys who need more support than their counterparts. In addition, we have detected some significant country&#45;specific differences with regard to self&#45;organisation or forms of assistance. In summary, the fe&#47;male project sheds light on important didactical and gender effects that can evolve from Web 2.0 e&#45;learning tools.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=45088"><b>Interactive learning projects for schools with Web 2.0 tools</b></A><br />Andreas Wiesner&#45;Steiner; Heike Wiesner; Sabine Zauchner<br /><i>International Journal of Innovation in Education, Vol. 1, No. 3 (2011) pp. 263 - 279</i><br />Web 2.0 has increasingly been adopted in education, but the varying approaches of girls and boys towards new technologies have found little consideration in pedagogical contexts. The research project &#39;female&#39; is devoted to this theme&#58; fe&#47;male places Web 2.0 technologies in education at centre stage. These technologies are analysed under the aspect of gender and also in relationship to their didactical deployment. This is based on the assumption that Web 2.0 technologies, which comprises core ideas of the web &#40;user&#45;friendliness, standardisation, participation and reutilisation&#41; will increasingly gain importance and function as the &#39;passage point&#39; for technology&#8211;gender&#8211;discourses. Within the fe&#47;male project nine Web 2.0 school projects &#40;covering fields such as mathematics, biology, chemistry, physics and history&#41; were implemented in schools and evaluated. The main results display that between the girls and boys who participated in the evaluations much more similarities were observable than differences. Furthermore, a tendency is observable, that girls even profit more from Web 2.0 school projects than boys who need more support than their counterparts. In addition, we have detected some significant country&#45;specific differences with regard to self&#45;organisation or forms of assistance. In summary, the fe&#47;male project sheds light on important didactical and gender effects that can evolve from Web 2.0 e&#45;learning tools.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJIIE.2011.045088</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Innovation in Education, Vol. 1, No. 3 (2011) pp. 263 - 279</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Andreas Wiesner&#45;Steiner; Heike Wiesner; Sabine Zauchner</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Hochschule f&#252;r Wirtschaft und Recht Berlin, Badensche Stra&#223;e 50 51, 10825 Berlin, Germany &#39; Hochschule f&#252;r Wirtschaft und Recht Berlin, Badensche Stra&#223;e 50 51, 10825 Berlin, Germany &#39; Donau&#45;Universit&#228;t Krems, Department f&#252;r Interaktive Medien und Bildungstechnologien, Dr.&#45;Karl&#45;Dorrek&#45;Stra&#223;e 30, A 3500 Krems, Austria</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>technology&#45;supported learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>participatory design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>interactive media</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Web 2.0</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>social media</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>interactive learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>internet</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>world wide web</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>social networking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>interactivity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>collaborative media</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>girls</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>boys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>new technologies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>pedagogical factors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>pedagogy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>females</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>males</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>didactical deployment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>user&#45;friendliness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>standardisation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>reutilisation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>passage points</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>technology discourses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>gender discourses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>school projects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>biology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>chemistry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>physics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>history</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>educational evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>country&#45;specific differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>self&#45;organisation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>assistance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>didactical effects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>gender effects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Austria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Germany</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>secondary education.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2012-01-24T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>263</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>279</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-24T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJIIE.2011.045089">
<title>Innovation in higher education quality assurance&#58;  an empirical study of Sweden and Egypt</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=45089</link>
<description>Purpose &#8211; The aim of this research is to innovate a new quality assessment and assurance techniques based on a holistic and multifunctional perspective, to examine the major factors affecting students&#39; perception of cumulative satisfaction and to address the question whether students in Sweden and Egypt evaluate quality of higher education similarly or differently. Design&#47;methodology&#47;approach &#8211; From the literature review, a draft questionnaire was constructed and tested to ensure that the instrument solicit information that is appropriate to internal and external quality assurance. The final draft questionnaire containing five quality constructs &#40;5Qs&#41; was distributed among university students in Sweden and Egypt. The collected data was analysed. Findings &#8211; In this research, we describe a study involving a new instrument, i.e. the 5Qs model. We modelled the student satisfaction as a function of the 5Q dimensions based on total relationship management &#40;TRM&#41; philosophy. To the extent possible, we draw upon scales which had been used in management, sociological, medical and pedagogical literature. Practical implications &#8211; The TRM strategy and 5Qs tool should be implemented to inspire all employees at the university, faculty and department to understand its main philosophy and approach. Originality&#47;value &#8211; This study presents an innovative quality evaluation and assurance model. The new 5Qs model, methodology, together with its implementation, has proved beneficial in terms of structure for designing a higher education quality measurement instrument and a framework for prioritising results and findings.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=45089"><b>Innovation in higher education quality assurance&#58;  an empirical study of Sweden and Egypt</b></A><br />Mosad Zineldin; Valentina Vasicheva; Mohamed Belal<br /><i>International Journal of Innovation in Education, Vol. 1, No. 3 (2011) pp. 280 - 299</i><br />Purpose &#8211; The aim of this research is to innovate a new quality assessment and assurance techniques based on a holistic and multifunctional perspective, to examine the major factors affecting students&#39; perception of cumulative satisfaction and to address the question whether students in Sweden and Egypt evaluate quality of higher education similarly or differently. Design&#47;methodology&#47;approach &#8211; From the literature review, a draft questionnaire was constructed and tested to ensure that the instrument solicit information that is appropriate to internal and external quality assurance. The final draft questionnaire containing five quality constructs &#40;5Qs&#41; was distributed among university students in Sweden and Egypt. The collected data was analysed. Findings &#8211; In this research, we describe a study involving a new instrument, i.e. the 5Qs model. We modelled the student satisfaction as a function of the 5Q dimensions based on total relationship management &#40;TRM&#41; philosophy. To the extent possible, we draw upon scales which had been used in management, sociological, medical and pedagogical literature. Practical implications &#8211; The TRM strategy and 5Qs tool should be implemented to inspire all employees at the university, faculty and department to understand its main philosophy and approach. Originality&#47;value &#8211; This study presents an innovative quality evaluation and assurance model. The new 5Qs model, methodology, together with its implementation, has proved beneficial in terms of structure for designing a higher education quality measurement instrument and a framework for prioritising results and findings.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJIIE.2011.045089</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Innovation in Education, Vol. 1, No. 3 (2011) pp. 280 - 299</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Mosad Zineldin; Valentina Vasicheva; Mohamed Belal</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>School of Business and Economics, Linnaeus University, SE&#45;351 95 V&#228;xj&#246;, Sweden &#39; School of Business and Economics, Linnaeus University, SE&#45;351 95 V&#228;xj&#246;, Sweden &#39; Faculty of Commerce, Damanhour University, Damanhour, Egypt</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>quality assurance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>QA</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>TRM</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>total relationship management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>holistic views</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sweden</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Egypt</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>university students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>universities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>quality assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>multifunctional perspectives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>student perceptions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>cumulative satisfaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>quality evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>internal quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>external quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>quality constructs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>5Qs model</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>student satisfaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>sociology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>medicine</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>pedagogy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>employees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>faculties</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>academic departments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>quality measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>behavioural conditions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>management strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>managerial philosophies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>higher education.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2012-01-24T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>280</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>299</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-24T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>

