<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">
<channel rdf:about="http://www.inderscience.com/current_issue_rss/index.php?journal=ijhrdm">
<title>Most recent issue published online for the International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management.</title>
<description>International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management</description>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=15&amp;year=2012&amp;vol=12&amp;issue=1/2</link>
<dc:publisher>Inderscience Publishers Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:language>en-uk</dc:language>
<prism:publicationName>International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1465-6612</prism:issn>
<prism:eIssn>1741-5160</prism:eIssn>
<prism:copyright>&#169; 2012 Inderscience Publishers Ltd</prism:copyright>
<prism:rightsAgent>editor@inderscience.com</prism:rightsAgent>
<image rdf:resource="https://www.inderscience.com/images/files/coverImgs/ijhrdm_scoverijhrdm.jpg" />
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044197" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044198" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044199" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044200" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044201" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044202" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044203" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044182" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044189" />
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>
<image rdf:about="https://www.inderscience.com/images/files/coverImgs/ijhrdm_scoverijhrdm.jpg">
<title>International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management</title>
<url>https://www.inderscience.com/images/files/coverImgs/ijhrdm_scoverijhrdm.jpg</url>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=15&amp;year=2012&amp;vol=12&amp;issue=1/2</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044197">
<title>Workplace learning&#58; a new model applied in a case study in the Netherlands</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44197</link>
<description>This article presents a new model for workplace learning based on an extensive literature search. The new model focuses on organisational variables that cause workplace learning, and that can be influenced by actions of management. The model has been applied in a case study in an organisation &#40;a Dutch water board&#41;. Findings show that with the new model of workplace learning a rich picture of workplace learning can be constructed. Moreover, this picture enables management to improve workplace learning systematically with planned interventions.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44197"><b>Workplace learning&#58; a new model applied in a case study in the Netherlands</b></A><br />Simone J. Van Zolingen; Laura Wortel<br /><i>International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Vol. 12, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 9 - 30</i><br />This article presents a new model for workplace learning based on an extensive literature search. The new model focuses on organisational variables that cause workplace learning, and that can be influenced by actions of management. The model has been applied in a case study in an organisation &#40;a Dutch water board&#41;. Findings show that with the new model of workplace learning a rich picture of workplace learning can be constructed. Moreover, this picture enables management to improve workplace learning systematically with planned interventions.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044197</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Vol. 12, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 9 - 30</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Simone J. Van Zolingen; Laura Wortel</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Institute for Management Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9108, 6500 HK Nijmegen, The Netherlands. &#39; Philips Healthcare, 5684 PC Best, The Netherlands</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>new models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>learning potential</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Netherlands</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Holland</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>organisational variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>managerial actions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>planned interventions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>water boards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>human resource development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>HRD</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>human resource management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>HRM</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>workplace learning.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-12-12T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1/2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>30</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-12T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044198">
<title>Boundaries and intersections&#58; a reflection on barriers and gateways to learning in the workplace</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44198</link>
<description>What do employers regard as important for their workplaces in relation to learning in the workplace&#63; An Australian research study exploring employer perceptions of the use and value of accredited training found, from the interviews of the human resources and training managers and business owners, that understandably their key driver is to &#39;get the job done&#39; followed by a need to provide training to meet regulatory requirements. Government financial incentives certainly were a factor supporting training in and for the workplace. Improved worker morale related to access to training was also recognised as having value, however a more extensive, comprehensive approach to learning in and for the workplace was not necessarily part of their agenda. It is argued that such perceptions form boundaries and intersections for learning in the workplace and that some worker&#45;learners need to cross boundaries or are rebuffed by them and stagnate, while others turn at different intersections as they learn, grow and advance their workplace development.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44198"><b>Boundaries and intersections&#58; a reflection on barriers and gateways to learning in the workplace</b></A><br />Margaret Malloch<br /><i>International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Vol. 12, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 31 - 44</i><br />What do employers regard as important for their workplaces in relation to learning in the workplace&#63; An Australian research study exploring employer perceptions of the use and value of accredited training found, from the interviews of the human resources and training managers and business owners, that understandably their key driver is to &#39;get the job done&#39; followed by a need to provide training to meet regulatory requirements. Government financial incentives certainly were a factor supporting training in and for the workplace. Improved worker morale related to access to training was also recognised as having value, however a more extensive, comprehensive approach to learning in and for the workplace was not necessarily part of their agenda. It is argued that such perceptions form boundaries and intersections for learning in the workplace and that some worker&#45;learners need to cross boundaries or are rebuffed by them and stagnate, while others turn at different intersections as they learn, grow and advance their workplace development.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044198</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Vol. 12, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 31 - 44</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Margaret Malloch</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Cass School of Education, University of East London, Stratford Campus, Water Lane, London, E15 4LZ, England</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>employer perceptions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>HRD personnel</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>workers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>learners</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>learning boundaries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>learning intersections</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>gateways</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>employers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Australia</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>employer perceptions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>accredited training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>human resource managers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>training managers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>business owners</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>regulatory requirements</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>government incentives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>financial incentives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>improved morale</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>worker morale</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>training access</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>workplace development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>human resource development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>human resource management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>HRM</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>workplace learning.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-12-12T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1/2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>31</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>44</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-12T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044199">
<title>In search of design guidelines for the improvement of the effectiveness of work&#45;related learning arrangements</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44199</link>
<description>This study addresses the question of which design guidelines are required in order to produce powerful, effective work&#45;related learning arrangements in higher education that will motivate students to learn. A work&#45;related learning arrangement is defined as an &#39;arranged&#39; educational learning track in an authentic working environment, where students learn in collaboration all the work processes that are typical for a portion of their future profession and the competences that go with it. In two case studies, a reconstructive study approach was taken to describe which factors are crucial for the efficiency of the design and the effectiveness of work&#45;related learning by students. The outcomes of both case studies will be used to draw up the first version of the design guidelines &#40;procedural and process curriculum specifications&#41; for the further development of work&#45;related learning arrangements.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44199"><b>In search of design guidelines for the improvement of the effectiveness of work&#45;related learning arrangements</b></A><br />Josephine Lappia; Jan Streumer<br /><i>International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Vol. 12, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 45 - 60</i><br />This study addresses the question of which design guidelines are required in order to produce powerful, effective work&#45;related learning arrangements in higher education that will motivate students to learn. A work&#45;related learning arrangement is defined as an &#39;arranged&#39; educational learning track in an authentic working environment, where students learn in collaboration all the work processes that are typical for a portion of their future profession and the competences that go with it. In two case studies, a reconstructive study approach was taken to describe which factors are crucial for the efficiency of the design and the effectiveness of work&#45;related learning by students. The outcomes of both case studies will be used to draw up the first version of the design guidelines &#40;procedural and process curriculum specifications&#41; for the further development of work&#45;related learning arrangements.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044199</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Vol. 12, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 45 - 60</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Josephine Lappia; Jan Streumer</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Rotterdam University, Museumpark 40, 3015 CX Rotterdam, The Netherlands. &#39; Rotterdam University, Museumpark 40, 3015 CX Rotterdam, The Netherlands</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>external consistency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>relational approaches</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>systematic approaches</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>work&#45;related learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>learning arrangements</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>higher education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>universities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>learning quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>design guidelines</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>procedural specifications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>curriculum specifications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>process specifications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>internal consistency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>student motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>educational learning tracks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>working environments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>work processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>future professions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>competences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>reconstructive studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>houses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>housing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rotterdam</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Netherlands</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Holland</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>secondary education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>pre&#45;university education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Roosendaal</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>teacher training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>human resource development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>HRD</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>human resource management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>HRM</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>workplace learning.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-12-12T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1/2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>45</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>60</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-12T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044200">
<title>Learning in&#45;between, across and beyond workplace boundaries</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44200</link>
<description>In this paper, we challenge conventional theories underpinning the practice of human resource development &#40;HRD&#41; that typically focus on the objects of learning   individuals, skills, jobs   or separate the contexts of work &#40;performance&#41; from learning &#40;training&#41;. Using case study research from a public utility and a winery, we found similarities in workers&#39; experiences of various organisational practices despite different objects of learning. These practices were, firstly, temporarily occupying &#40;acting up&#41; in a more senior position and, secondly, collaborating across functions. Unlike notions of boundary&#45;crossing or job rotation, we argue that learning &#39;in&#45;between&#39; develops interactional competence that is grounded within the work practices of interacting individuals. This relational view opens up possibilities for redirecting the focus of HRD practice towards integrating work and learning in ways that develop the potential for learning in&#45;between, across and beyond the boundaries of work.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44200"><b>Learning in&#45;between, across and beyond workplace boundaries</b></A><br />Mary C. Johnsson; David Boud; Nicky Solomon<br /><i>International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Vol. 12, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 61 - 76</i><br />In this paper, we challenge conventional theories underpinning the practice of human resource development &#40;HRD&#41; that typically focus on the objects of learning   individuals, skills, jobs   or separate the contexts of work &#40;performance&#41; from learning &#40;training&#41;. Using case study research from a public utility and a winery, we found similarities in workers&#39; experiences of various organisational practices despite different objects of learning. These practices were, firstly, temporarily occupying &#40;acting up&#41; in a more senior position and, secondly, collaborating across functions. Unlike notions of boundary&#45;crossing or job rotation, we argue that learning &#39;in&#45;between&#39; develops interactional competence that is grounded within the work practices of interacting individuals. This relational view opens up possibilities for redirecting the focus of HRD practice towards integrating work and learning in ways that develop the potential for learning in&#45;between, across and beyond the boundaries of work.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044200</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Vol. 12, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 61 - 76</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Mary C. Johnsson; David Boud; Nicky Solomon</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Technology, Sydney, P.O. Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia. &#39; Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Technology, Sydney, P.O. Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia. &#39; Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Technology, Sydney, P.O. Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>workplace boundaries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>boundary crossing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>acting up</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>learning spaces</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>organisational practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>relational interactions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>learning objects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>jobs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>work contexts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>employee performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>public utilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>wineries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>worker experiences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>senior management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>function collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>job rotation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>interactional competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>work practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>interacting individuals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>relational views</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>energy infrastructures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>customer services</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>wine industry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Australia</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>human resource development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>HRD</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>human resource management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>HRM</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>workplace learning.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-12-12T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1/2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>61</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>76</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-12T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044201">
<title>All by myself. Research into employees&#39; informal learning experiences</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44201</link>
<description>Informal learning is seen as an important phenomenon in the contemporary era of lifelong learning. This study examined informal learning activities and its outcomes as well as the factors that influenced, either positively or negatively, informal learning. In total 24 employees of the Dutch Open University were interviewed about their main informal learning experiences over the last two years. Findings revealed that the majority of the informal learning outcomes are skill&#45;based, generic and applicable in a larger cluster of jobs than participants&#39; present jobs. Participants favoured learning activities that allow high levels of internal locus of control. The main stimulus for informal learning lies in the changing demands of their daily job. Other organisational, job and employee characteristics, such as age, job tenure, attitude of supervisor and colleagues, hardly influenced participants&#39; informal learning. The article concludes with some critical remarks on the value of informal learning from the perspective of lifelong learning.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44201"><b>All by myself. Research into employees&#39; informal learning experiences</b></A><br />Marcel Van Der Klink; Jo Boon; Kathleen Schlusmans<br /><i>International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Vol. 12, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 77 - 91</i><br />Informal learning is seen as an important phenomenon in the contemporary era of lifelong learning. This study examined informal learning activities and its outcomes as well as the factors that influenced, either positively or negatively, informal learning. In total 24 employees of the Dutch Open University were interviewed about their main informal learning experiences over the last two years. Findings revealed that the majority of the informal learning outcomes are skill&#45;based, generic and applicable in a larger cluster of jobs than participants&#39; present jobs. Participants favoured learning activities that allow high levels of internal locus of control. The main stimulus for informal learning lies in the changing demands of their daily job. Other organisational, job and employee characteristics, such as age, job tenure, attitude of supervisor and colleagues, hardly influenced participants&#39; informal learning. The article concludes with some critical remarks on the value of informal learning from the perspective of lifelong learning.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044201</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Vol. 12, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 77 - 91</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Marcel Van Der Klink; Jo Boon; Kathleen Schlusmans</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, PO Box 2960, 6401 DL Heerlen, The Netherlands. &#39; Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, PO Box 2960, 6401 DL Heerlen, The Netherlands. &#39; Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, PO Box 2960, 6401 DL Heerlen, The Netherlands</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>informal learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>learning transfer</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>lifelong learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Open University of the Netherlands</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Holland</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>higher education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>universities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>learning experiences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>learning outcomes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>skill&#45;based learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>generic learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>jobs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>internal control</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>locus of control</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>job demands</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>organisational characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>job characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>employee characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>age</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>job tenure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>supervisor attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>colleague attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>human resource development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>HRD</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>human resource management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>HRM</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>workplace learning.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-12-12T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1/2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>77</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>91</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-12T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044202">
<title>When workplace learning fails&#58; individual and organisational limitations   exemplarily demonstrated by the issue of responsibility in work life</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44202</link>
<description>There is a consensus in educational, managerial, and business debates that economic and societal changes in globalisation demand knowledge&#45;based enterprises and employees who permanently develop and actualise their competences. Hence, workplace learning has become a crucial aspect of business organisation. However, the mainstream perspective in literature focuses on the individual&#39;s demand and responsibility for his or her own success in developing the necessary competences. This contribution focuses on observing the current debates on responsibility in work life and investigates individual and organisational limitations of workplace learning. Taking into consideration two studies on workplace learning, oppositional findings are to be discussed&#58; on the basis of aggregated quantitative data favourable conditions for workplace learning appear. However, qualitative analyses on the level of individual respondents show a somewhat different picture. Employees experience limited participation in crucial aspects and experience limited rewards for individual competence development. This article concludes that successful workplace learning is not only an individual&#39;s responsibility but also a crucial task for the management of a business and its workplaces.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44202"><b>When workplace learning fails&#58; individual and organisational limitations   exemplarily demonstrated by the issue of responsibility in work life</b></A><br />Christian Harteis<br /><i>International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Vol. 12, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 92 - 107</i><br />There is a consensus in educational, managerial, and business debates that economic and societal changes in globalisation demand knowledge&#45;based enterprises and employees who permanently develop and actualise their competences. Hence, workplace learning has become a crucial aspect of business organisation. However, the mainstream perspective in literature focuses on the individual&#39;s demand and responsibility for his or her own success in developing the necessary competences. This contribution focuses on observing the current debates on responsibility in work life and investigates individual and organisational limitations of workplace learning. Taking into consideration two studies on workplace learning, oppositional findings are to be discussed&#58; on the basis of aggregated quantitative data favourable conditions for workplace learning appear. However, qualitative analyses on the level of individual respondents show a somewhat different picture. Employees experience limited participation in crucial aspects and experience limited rewards for individual competence development. This article concludes that successful workplace learning is not only an individual&#39;s responsibility but also a crucial task for the management of a business and its workplaces.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044202</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Vol. 12, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 92 - 107</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Christian Harteis</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Institute of Educational Science, Working Group Educational Management and Research on Further Education, University of Paderborn, Warburger Str. 100, D&#45;33100 Paderborn, Germany</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>professional learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>personal responsibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>business organisations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>individual limitations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>organisational limitations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>work life</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>economic changes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>societal changes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>globalisation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>knowledge&#45;based enterprises</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>knowledge&#45;based employees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>competence development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>competence actualisation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>competences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>limited participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>limited rewards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>individual development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>aggregated data</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>quantitative data</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>qualitative analyses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>human resource development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>HRD</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>human resource management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>HRM</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>workplace learning.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-12-12T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1/2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>92</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>107</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-12T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044203">
<title>Workplace learning&#58; panacea or challenge&#63; Epilogue of a special issue on boundaries of workplace learning</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44203</link>
<description>This article reflects on the previous articles in this special issue by discussing some common themes and raising some proposals for future research on the topic of workplace learning and its boundaries. The article subsequently discusses objects and results of workplace learning, the issue of learning through acquisition and&#47;or participation, the interplay between organisational and individual factors, the issue of access to learning opportunities, the role of workplace learning in education and HRD, respectively.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44203"><b>Workplace learning&#58; panacea or challenge&#63; Epilogue of a special issue on boundaries of workplace learning</b></A><br />Jeroen H.A.M. Onstenk<br /><i>International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Vol. 12, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 108 - 118</i><br />This article reflects on the previous articles in this special issue by discussing some common themes and raising some proposals for future research on the topic of workplace learning and its boundaries. The article subsequently discusses objects and results of workplace learning, the issue of learning through acquisition and&#47;or participation, the interplay between organisational and individual factors, the issue of access to learning opportunities, the role of workplace learning in education and HRD, respectively.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044203</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Vol. 12, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 108 - 118</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Jeroen H.A.M. Onstenk</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Inholland University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 558, 2003 RN Haarlem, The Netherlands</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>learning potential</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>learning results</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>access learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>learning  opportunities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>learning boundaries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>learning through acquisition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>learning through participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>organisational factors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>individual factors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>human resource development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>HRD</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>human resource management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>HRM</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>workplace learning.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-12-12T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1/2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>108</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>118</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-12T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044182">
<title>The impact of culture on corporate training design&#58; a review of the current state of knowledge</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44182</link>
<description>The purpose of this paper is to synthesise and critique the literature related to the impact of national culture on corporate training design. There is evidence of a lack of systematic and homogenous studies with a total absence of an examination of the impact of national culture on training evaluation. The study draws the attention to practical implications as practitioners and organisations operating in the international arena should take into consideration cultural differences to efficiently design training activities across cultures and for employees in different countries.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44182"><b>The impact of culture on corporate training design&#58; a review of the current state of knowledge</b></A><br />Abderrahman Hassi<br /><i>International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Vol. 12, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 119 - 139</i><br />The purpose of this paper is to synthesise and critique the literature related to the impact of national culture on corporate training design. There is evidence of a lack of systematic and homogenous studies with a total absence of an examination of the impact of national culture on training evaluation. The study draws the attention to practical implications as practitioners and organisations operating in the international arena should take into consideration cultural differences to efficiently design training activities across cultures and for employees in different countries.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044182</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Vol. 12, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 119 - 139</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Abderrahman Hassi</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>School of Part&#45;Time Studies and Continuing Education, Algonquin College, 1385 Woodroffe Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K2G 1V8, Canada</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>national cultures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>corporate training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>training design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>cultural differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>training activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>employees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>human resource development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>HRD</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>human resource management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>HRM</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>workplace learning.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-12-12T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1/2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>119</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>139</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-12T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044189">
<title>Employee retention&#58; exploring the relationship between employee commitment, organisational citizenship behaviour and the decision to leave the organisation</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44189</link>
<description>This paper examines the mediating effect of citizenship behaviour on the relationship between employee commitment and intent to leave at the organisational level. Two field studies involving three independent samples were conducted. The procedure used by Baron and Kenny &#40;1986&#41; was selected for the purposes of the mediation test. In study 1 &#40;N &#61; 704&#41;, the findings indicate a partial mediation of citizenship behaviour in the relationship between employee commitment and intent to leave the organisation. In study 2, the data show the same pattern in both sample A &#40;N &#61; 651&#41; and sample B &#40;N &#61; 355&#41;. While sportsmanship was found to play a mediating role between employee commitment and intent to leave the organisation, no mediation was found for civic virtue. The findings are discussed.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44189"><b>Employee retention&#58; exploring the relationship between employee commitment, organisational citizenship behaviour and the decision to leave the organisation</b></A><br />Pascal Paill&#233;<br /><i>International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Vol. 12, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 140 - 157</i><br />This paper examines the mediating effect of citizenship behaviour on the relationship between employee commitment and intent to leave at the organisational level. Two field studies involving three independent samples were conducted. The procedure used by Baron and Kenny &#40;1986&#41; was selected for the purposes of the mediation test. In study 1 &#40;N &#61; 704&#41;, the findings indicate a partial mediation of citizenship behaviour in the relationship between employee commitment and intent to leave the organisation. In study 2, the data show the same pattern in both sample A &#40;N &#61; 651&#41; and sample B &#40;N &#61; 355&#41;. While sportsmanship was found to play a mediating role between employee commitment and intent to leave the organisation, no mediation was found for civic virtue. The findings are discussed.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJHRDM.2012.044189</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Vol. 12, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 140 - 157</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Pascal Paill&#233;</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>D&#233;partement Management, Universit&#233; Laval, G1K7P4, Qu&#233;bec, QC, Canada</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>organisational behaviour</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>citizenship behaviour</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>employee commitment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>intent to leave</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>organisations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>mediation tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>employee retention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>mediating effects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reuben Baron</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>David Kenny</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>partial mediation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>sportsmanship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>civic virtue</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>public employees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>government agencies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quebec</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Canada</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>human resource development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>HRD</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>human resource management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>HRM.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-12-12T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1/2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>140</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>157</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-12T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>

