<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">
<channel rdf:about="http://www.inderscience.com/current_issue_rss/index.php?journal=ijeim">
<title>Most recent issue published online for the International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management.</title>
<description>International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management</description>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=7&amp;year=2012&amp;vol=15&amp;issue=1/2</link>
<dc:publisher>Inderscience Publishers Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:language>en-uk</dc:language>
<prism:publicationName>International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1368-275X</prism:issn>
<prism:eIssn>1741-5098</prism:eIssn>
<prism:copyright>&#169; 2012 Inderscience Publishers Ltd</prism:copyright>
<prism:rightsAgent>editor@inderscience.com</prism:rightsAgent>
<image rdf:resource="https://www.inderscience.com/images/files/coverImgs/ijeim_scoverijeim.jpg" />
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2012.044074" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2012.044075" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2012.044076" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2012.044077" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2012.044078" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2012.044073" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2012.044072" />
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>
<image rdf:about="https://www.inderscience.com/images/files/coverImgs/ijeim_scoverijeim.jpg">
<title>International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management</title>
<url>https://www.inderscience.com/images/files/coverImgs/ijeim_scoverijeim.jpg</url>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=7&amp;year=2012&amp;vol=15&amp;issue=1/2</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2012.044074">
<title>Searching near and far&#58; a practice perspective of knowledge access in emerging clusters</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44074</link>
<description>Search practices for accessing external knowledge are widely recognised as crucial for innovation. Geographic proximity, industrial clusters and relational proximity are argued as providing suitable conditions for searching, especially given the context&#47;situation dependence of search practices. However, their influence on searching in emerging clusters requires elaboration. Taking the practice perspective, this study explores how geographic proximity, cluster life&#45;stage and relational proximity influence search practices. Agents&#39; practices from an emerging biotechnology cluster are compared to practices from existing clusters. Experience&#45;based differences in agents&#39; practices are theorised as regulars and strangers in cultural fields. Implications for cluster life&#45;stage and relational proximity research, and public policy regarding  are considered.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44074"><b>Searching near and far&#58; a practice perspective of knowledge access in emerging clusters</b></A><br />Lisa Callagher<br /><i>International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Vol. 15, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 4 - 28</i><br />Search practices for accessing external knowledge are widely recognised as crucial for innovation. Geographic proximity, industrial clusters and relational proximity are argued as providing suitable conditions for searching, especially given the context&#47;situation dependence of search practices. However, their influence on searching in emerging clusters requires elaboration. Taking the practice perspective, this study explores how geographic proximity, cluster life&#45;stage and relational proximity influence search practices. Agents&#39; practices from an emerging biotechnology cluster are compared to practices from existing clusters. Experience&#45;based differences in agents&#39; practices are theorised as regulars and strangers in cultural fields. Implications for cluster life&#45;stage and relational proximity research, and public policy regarding  are considered.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJEIM.2012.044074</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Vol. 15, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 4 - 28</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Lisa Callagher</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Department of Management and International Business, University of Auckland Business School, Private Bag 92109, Auckland, New Zealand</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>emerging clusters</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>industrial clusters</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>biotechnology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>biotech clusters</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>knowledge access</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>situated learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>knowledge search</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>entrepreneurship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>geographic proximity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>cluster life stages</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>relational proximity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>cluster management.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-12-02T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1/2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>28</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-02T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2012.044075">
<title>Knowledge flow at the fuzzy front&#45;end of inter&#45;firm R&amp;D collaborations   insights into SMEs in the pharmaceutical industry</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44075</link>
<description>In this paper we present the preliminary results of our research which explores the role of reciprocal knowledge flow in the fuzzy front&#45;end of collaboration activities. On the basis of desk research, i.e., a secondary research, we develop a model to display the impact of open innovation capacities in the initiation and constitution phases. We then match this model with our empirical findings in a study with pharmaceutical SMEs. We find that both absorptive and desorptive capacities play a pivotal role in the interaction of potential cooperation partners. During the negotiation process, however, the importance of these capacities shifts from the firm to the personal level.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44075"><b>Knowledge flow at the fuzzy front&#45;end of inter&#45;firm R&amp;D collaborations   insights into SMEs in the pharmaceutical industry</b></A><br />Andreas Braun; Elisabeth Mueller; Silvia Adelhelm; Gergana Vladova<br /><i>International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Vol. 15, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 29 - 46</i><br />In this paper we present the preliminary results of our research which explores the role of reciprocal knowledge flow in the fuzzy front&#45;end of collaboration activities. On the basis of desk research, i.e., a secondary research, we develop a model to display the impact of open innovation capacities in the initiation and constitution phases. We then match this model with our empirical findings in a study with pharmaceutical SMEs. We find that both absorptive and desorptive capacities play a pivotal role in the interaction of potential cooperation partners. During the negotiation process, however, the importance of these capacities shifts from the firm to the personal level.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJEIM.2012.044075</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Vol. 15, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 29 - 46</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Andreas Braun; Elisabeth Mueller; Silvia Adelhelm; Gergana Vladova</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Centre for Entrepreneurship and Innovation, University of Potsdam, August&#45;Bebel&#45;Str. 89, 14482 Potsdam, Germany. &#39; Centre for Entrepreneurship and Innovation, University of Potsdam, August&#45;Bebel&#45;Str. 89, 14482 Potsdam, Germany. &#39; Centre for Entrepreneurship and Innovation, University of Potsdam, August&#45;Bebel&#45;Str. 89, 14482 Potsdam, Germany. &#39; Business Information Systems and Electronic Government, University of Potsdam, August&#45;Bebel&#45;Str. 89, 14482 Potsdam, Germany</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>inter&#45;firm R&amp;D</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>R&amp;D collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>absorptive capacity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>desorptive capacity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>knowledge flow</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>flow modelling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>SMEs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>small and medium&#45;sized enterprises</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>pharmaceutical industry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>research and development.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-12-02T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1/2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>29</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>46</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-02T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2012.044076">
<title>Dynamics of development in innovation collaboration   relationships, learning and end products</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44076</link>
<description>This paper addresses the developments that occur during collaborative innovation process from three viewpoints&#58; characteristics of the collaboration relationships, the learning between partners and the end products being developed in the innovation process. Combining these three simultaneous change processes gives a holistic, rich picture of the innovation process, which helps in understanding the phenomenon, identifying development needs and in planning the innovation process from both learning and collaboration perspectives. The study is based on the results of several interviews with managers responsible for innovation process in industrial companies.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44076"><b>Dynamics of development in innovation collaboration   relationships, learning and end products</b></A><br />Hannele Lampela<br /><i>International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Vol. 15, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 47 - 58</i><br />This paper addresses the developments that occur during collaborative innovation process from three viewpoints&#58; characteristics of the collaboration relationships, the learning between partners and the end products being developed in the innovation process. Combining these three simultaneous change processes gives a holistic, rich picture of the innovation process, which helps in understanding the phenomenon, identifying development needs and in planning the innovation process from both learning and collaboration perspectives. The study is based on the results of several interviews with managers responsible for innovation process in industrial companies.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJEIM.2012.044076</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Vol. 15, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 47 - 58</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Hannele Lampela</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Department of Industrial Management, Lappeenranta University of Technology, P.O. Box 20, 53851 Lappeenranta, Finland</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>collaborative innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>product development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>innovation networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>innovation process.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-12-02T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1/2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>47</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>58</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-02T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2012.044077">
<title>Rethinking the role of external collaboration in product innovation</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44077</link>
<description>Investigating the associations between inter&#45;organisational relationship&#45; and innovation&#45;oriented antecedents and consequences of cooperative multiple stakeholder product innovation and their effects on overall firm performance of Australian manufacturing firms, we found that involving external stakeholders in product innovation indirectly enhanced the quality of stakeholder relationships, but did not predict market&#45; or technical&#45;based product innovation outcomes as hypothesised. The key driver of overall firm performance was market&#45;driven product innovation performance, which was predicted by product innovation strategy and product innovation spending. Our results suggest the need for simultaneous consideration of product innovation&#45; and multiple external stakeholder&#45;based strategic orientations in enhancing business success.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44077"><b>Rethinking the role of external collaboration in product innovation</b></A><br />Tania Von der Heidt; Don Scott<br /><i>International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Vol. 15, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 59 - 90</i><br />Investigating the associations between inter&#45;organisational relationship&#45; and innovation&#45;oriented antecedents and consequences of cooperative multiple stakeholder product innovation and their effects on overall firm performance of Australian manufacturing firms, we found that involving external stakeholders in product innovation indirectly enhanced the quality of stakeholder relationships, but did not predict market&#45; or technical&#45;based product innovation outcomes as hypothesised. The key driver of overall firm performance was market&#45;driven product innovation performance, which was predicted by product innovation strategy and product innovation spending. Our results suggest the need for simultaneous consideration of product innovation&#45; and multiple external stakeholder&#45;based strategic orientations in enhancing business success.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJEIM.2012.044077</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Vol. 15, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 59 - 90</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Tania Von der Heidt; Don Scott</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Southern Cross University, School of Commerce and Management, Military Drive, Lismore NSW 2480, Australia. &#39; Southern Cross University, School of Commerce and Management, Military Drive, Lismore NSW 2480, Australia</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>external collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>inter&#45;organisational relationships</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>IORs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>stakeholder orientation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>relationship quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>product innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>innovation performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>structural equation modelling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>SEM</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Australia</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>manufacturing firms</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>strategic orientation.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-12-02T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1/2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>59</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>90</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-02T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2012.044078">
<title>Collaborative approaches to new product development&#58; the case of Russia</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44078</link>
<description>The paper focuses on collaborative practices applied in new product development &#40;NPD&#41; in Russian firms. Interfirm collaboration is considered as a crucial factor of NPD success in the context of a transitional economy. The research questions are linked to analysis of Russian firms&#39; openness in interaction with external partners in relation to product innovation; whether these patterns are related to the type of product innovation; and to what extent these patterns reflect the strategic orientation of the firm. The empirical basis of the paper is a cross&#45;sectional study conducted on a sample of 223 Russian firms. The results indicate differences in interfirm collaboration in regard to the firm&#39;s NPD strategy, the type of product innovation, and the strategic aims of the firm.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44078"><b>Collaborative approaches to new product development&#58; the case of Russia</b></A><br />Maria M. Smirnova; Daria Podmetina; Juha V&#228;&#228;t&#228;nen; Marko Torkkeli<br /><i>International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Vol. 15, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 91 - 107</i><br />The paper focuses on collaborative practices applied in new product development &#40;NPD&#41; in Russian firms. Interfirm collaboration is considered as a crucial factor of NPD success in the context of a transitional economy. The research questions are linked to analysis of Russian firms&#39; openness in interaction with external partners in relation to product innovation; whether these patterns are related to the type of product innovation; and to what extent these patterns reflect the strategic orientation of the firm. The empirical basis of the paper is a cross&#45;sectional study conducted on a sample of 223 Russian firms. The results indicate differences in interfirm collaboration in regard to the firm&#39;s NPD strategy, the type of product innovation, and the strategic aims of the firm.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJEIM.2012.044078</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Vol. 15, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 91 - 107</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Maria M. Smirnova; Daria Podmetina; Juha V&#228;&#228;t&#228;nen; Marko Torkkeli</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Graduate School of Management, Saint Petersburg State University, Volkhovsky per., 3, Saint Petersburg, 199004, Russia. &#39; Lappeenranta University of Technology, P.O. Box 20, 53581, Lappeenranta, Finland. &#39; Lappeenranta University of Technology, P.O. Box 20, 53581, Lappeenranta, Finland. &#39; Lappeenranta University of Technology, Prikaatintie 9, 45100, Kouvola, Finland</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>product innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>new product development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>collaborative NPD</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>collaborative innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>partners</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Russia</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>transitional economies.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-12-02T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1/2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>91</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>107</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-02T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2012.044073">
<title>Incubation time, incubator age, and firm survival after graduation</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44073</link>
<description>On the basis of a sample of 149 graduate firms from five German business incubators, this article contributes to incubator&#47;incubation literature by investigating the effects of the age of the incubators and the firms&#39; incubation time in securing long&#45;term survival of the firms after leaving the incubator facilities. The empirical findings from Cox proportional hazards regression and parametric accelerated failure time models reveal a statistically significant negative impact for both variables incubator age and incubation time on post&#45;graduation firm survival. One important implication that follows from the empirical results for policy makers and managers of those initiatives is that, when incubator managers become increasingly involved in various regional development activities, this may reduce the effectiveness of incubator support. Also, our finding speaks in favour of a strict limitation of incubation times and reinforces arguments of the supporters of maximum tenancy.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44073"><b>Incubation time, incubator age, and firm survival after graduation</b></A><br />Michael Schwartz<br /><i>International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Vol. 15, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 108 - 130</i><br />On the basis of a sample of 149 graduate firms from five German business incubators, this article contributes to incubator&#47;incubation literature by investigating the effects of the age of the incubators and the firms&#39; incubation time in securing long&#45;term survival of the firms after leaving the incubator facilities. The empirical findings from Cox proportional hazards regression and parametric accelerated failure time models reveal a statistically significant negative impact for both variables incubator age and incubation time on post&#45;graduation firm survival. One important implication that follows from the empirical results for policy makers and managers of those initiatives is that, when incubator managers become increasingly involved in various regional development activities, this may reduce the effectiveness of incubator support. Also, our finding speaks in favour of a strict limitation of incubation times and reinforces arguments of the supporters of maximum tenancy.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJEIM.2012.044073</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Vol. 15, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 108 - 130</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Michael Schwartz</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Department of Urban Economics, Halle Institute for Economic Research, P.O. Box 11 03 61, 06017 Halle &#40;Saale&#41;, Germany.</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>firm survival</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>hazard rates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>business incubators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>local technology policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>entrepreneurship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>incubation time</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>incubator age</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Germany</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>regional development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>incubator management.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-12-02T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1/2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>108</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>130</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-02T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2012.044072">
<title>Modelling competence acquisition in small firms</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44072</link>
<description>Prior research has not given much attention to competence acquisition in small firms. In response, we developed a competence acquisition model in a sample of 842 small firms. We then tested the model through multiple regression analyses. The model acknowledges the influence of factors related to the entrepreneur, the business concept, and the small firm&#39;s existing competence based on how it acquires competence &#40;whether it uses internal, social network, or market modes&#41; and how this selection of modes of competence acquisition influences performance. In support of a contingency view, we find that certain antecedents seem to have different kinds of influence on the modes of competence acquisition in sub&#45;samples characterised by different levels of internal organisational complexity and external environmental uncertainty. The influence of internal acquisition on firm performance is robust across the samples. We discuss the implications of our findings and suggest areas for future research.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44072"><b>Modelling competence acquisition in small firms</b></A><br />Malin Malmstr&#246;m; Joakim Wincent<br /><i>International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Vol. 15, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 131 - 158</i><br />Prior research has not given much attention to competence acquisition in small firms. In response, we developed a competence acquisition model in a sample of 842 small firms. We then tested the model through multiple regression analyses. The model acknowledges the influence of factors related to the entrepreneur, the business concept, and the small firm&#39;s existing competence based on how it acquires competence &#40;whether it uses internal, social network, or market modes&#41; and how this selection of modes of competence acquisition influences performance. In support of a contingency view, we find that certain antecedents seem to have different kinds of influence on the modes of competence acquisition in sub&#45;samples characterised by different levels of internal organisational complexity and external environmental uncertainty. The influence of internal acquisition on firm performance is robust across the samples. We discuss the implications of our findings and suggest areas for future research.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJEIM.2012.044072</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Vol. 15, No. 1/2 (2012) pp. 131 - 158</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Malin Malmstr&#246;m; Joakim Wincent</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>ETS, Lule&#229; University of Technology, SE&#45;971 87 Lule&#229;, Sweden. &#39; ETS, Lule&#229; University of Technology, SE&#45;971 87 Lule&#229;, Sweden</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>competences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>firm performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>competence acquisition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>small firms</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>entrepreneurship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>organisational complexity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>uncertainty.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-12-02T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1/2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>131</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>158</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-02T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>

