<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">
<channel rdf:about="http://www.inderscience.com/current_issue_rss/index.php?journal=ijeg">
<title>Most recent issue published online for the International Journal of Electronic Governance.</title>
<description>International Journal of Electronic Governance</description>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=128&amp;year=2011&amp;vol=4&amp;issue=3</link>
<dc:publisher>Inderscience Publishers Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:language>en-uk</dc:language>
<prism:publicationName>International Journal of Electronic Governance</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1742-7509</prism:issn>
<prism:eIssn>1742-7517</prism:eIssn>
<prism:copyright>&#169; 2011 Inderscience Publishers Ltd</prism:copyright>
<prism:rightsAgent>editor@inderscience.com</prism:rightsAgent>
<image rdf:resource="https://www.inderscience.com/images/files/coverImgs/ijeg_scoverijeg.jpg" />
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2011.043815" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2011.043819" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2011.043818" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2011.043821" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2011.043817" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2011.043842" />
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>
<image rdf:about="https://www.inderscience.com/images/files/coverImgs/ijeg_scoverijeg.jpg">
<title>International Journal of Electronic Governance</title>
<url>https://www.inderscience.com/images/files/coverImgs/ijeg_scoverijeg.jpg</url>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=128&amp;year=2011&amp;vol=4&amp;issue=3</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2011.043815">
<title>A cross&#45;national comparison of e&#45;government success measures&#58; a theory&#45;based empirical research</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43815</link>
<description>The present research investigates citizen experience with e&#45;government in the USA and Spain by utilising the DeLone and McLean &#40;1992&#41; theory of Information Systems &#40;ISs&#41; success. A parsimonious causal model was derived from direct and indirect impacts of e&#45;government characteristics. These relationships were tested using the AMOS&#47;SEM approach. The SEM results indicated citizens in both countries who perceive e&#45;government services to be of high quality are more likely to be satisfied with these services and this satisfaction is more likely to contribute towards e&#45;government success. This satisfaction is also more likely to motivate the citizens to use e&#45;government services more frequently.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43815"><b>A cross&#45;national comparison of e&#45;government success measures&#58; a theory&#45;based empirical research</b></A><br />Leopoldo A. Gemoets; M. Adam Mahmood; B. Adenso&#45;Diaz; Pilar Gonzalez<br /><i>International Journal of Electronic Governance, Vol. 4, No. 3 (2011) pp. 184 - 208</i><br />The present research investigates citizen experience with e&#45;government in the USA and Spain by utilising the DeLone and McLean &#40;1992&#41; theory of Information Systems &#40;ISs&#41; success. A parsimonious causal model was derived from direct and indirect impacts of e&#45;government characteristics. These relationships were tested using the AMOS&#47;SEM approach. The SEM results indicated citizens in both countries who perceive e&#45;government services to be of high quality are more likely to be satisfied with these services and this satisfaction is more likely to contribute towards e&#45;government success. This satisfaction is also more likely to motivate the citizens to use e&#45;government services more frequently.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJEG.2011.043815</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Electronic Governance, Vol. 4, No. 3 (2011) pp. 184 - 208</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Leopoldo A. Gemoets; M. Adam Mahmood; B. Adenso&#45;Diaz; Pilar Gonzalez</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Department of Information and Decision Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79968, USA. &#39; Department of Information and Decision Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79968, USA. &#39; Engineering School at Gijon, Operation and Production Management, University of Oviedo, Gijon E&#45;33204, Spain. &#39; Engineering School at Gijon, Operation and Production Management, University of Oviedo, Gijon E&#45;33204, Spain</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>e&#45;government success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>risk reduction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>theory&#45;based research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>empirical research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>citizen satisfaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>e&#45;government quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>multicultural environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>model validation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>e&#45;government models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>hypothesis testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>user recommendations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>e&#45;government users</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>electronic government</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>cross&#45;national comparison</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>USA</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>United States</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Spain</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>e&#45;government services.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-11-23T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>184</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>208</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-23T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2011.043819">
<title>Migration&#45;aware policy&#45;making in decentralised and dynamic social and collaborative environments</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43819</link>
<description>Migration for employment is acknowledged to have direct consequences on National economies, as well as the overall economic situation of the European Union &#40;EU&#41;. Migration policy and decision&#45;makers need to systematically collaborate towards sophisticated approaches that facilitate legal immigrants to be effectively integrated in labour markets and public administration processes. Latest ICT developments, which integrate Web 2.0 technologies, collaborative knowledge management systems, and semantic analysis technologies, allow participatory governance and citizen&#45;generated policy making. This paper presents a collaborative migration policy&#45;modelling centre, techniques, solutions and overall services for collaborative development of immigration policies, as well as for supporting related decisions.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43819"><b>Migration&#45;aware policy&#45;making in decentralised and dynamic social and collaborative environments</b></A><br />Athanasios Karantjias; Nineta Polemi; Teta Stamati<br /><i>International Journal of Electronic Governance, Vol. 4, No. 3 (2011) pp. 209 - 229</i><br />Migration for employment is acknowledged to have direct consequences on National economies, as well as the overall economic situation of the European Union &#40;EU&#41;. Migration policy and decision&#45;makers need to systematically collaborate towards sophisticated approaches that facilitate legal immigrants to be effectively integrated in labour markets and public administration processes. Latest ICT developments, which integrate Web 2.0 technologies, collaborative knowledge management systems, and semantic analysis technologies, allow participatory governance and citizen&#45;generated policy making. This paper presents a collaborative migration policy&#45;modelling centre, techniques, solutions and overall services for collaborative development of immigration policies, as well as for supporting related decisions.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJEG.2011.043819</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Electronic Governance, Vol. 4, No. 3 (2011) pp. 209 - 229</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Athanasios Karantjias; Nineta Polemi; Teta Stamati</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Department of Computer Science, University of Pireaus, 80 Karaoli &amp; Dimitriou Str, 185 34 Pireaus, Greece &#39; Department of Computer Science, University of Piraeus, Piraeus, Greece &#39; National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Department of Informatics and Telecommunications Panepistimiopolis, Ilissia Athens 15784, Greece</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>migration information systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>social computing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>policy making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>participatory governance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>security</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>privacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>public administration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>legal immigrants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>immigration policies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>e&#45;governance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>electronic governance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>ICT</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Web 2.0</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>collaborative knowledge management systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>semantic analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>policy modelling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>decision making.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-11-23T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>209</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>229</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-23T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2011.043818">
<title>How can law improve the use of web 2.0 in public sector information diffusion&#63;</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43818</link>
<description>Web 2.0 will increase the diffusion of public sector information and the number of actors who can diffuse it. It is necessary to take measures to guarantee transparency and availability of information by all citizens when using Web 2.0. Specifically, in the paper we suggest to adopt several principles to improve the dissemination of public sector information via Web 2.0, which can be introduced regulating e&#45;government, extending legislation on access to information or improving regulation on information re&#45;use when public sector information is diffused by public administration. When information is diffused by the public, other mechanisms are proposed like re&#45;use licences, codes of conduct, quality labels and terms and conditions, content rate systems and early warning and correction mechanisms.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43818"><b>How can law improve the use of web 2.0 in public sector information diffusion&#63;</b></A><br />Agusti Cerrillo&#45;i&#45;Martinez<br /><i>International Journal of Electronic Governance, Vol. 4, No. 3 (2011) pp. 230 - 247</i><br />Web 2.0 will increase the diffusion of public sector information and the number of actors who can diffuse it. It is necessary to take measures to guarantee transparency and availability of information by all citizens when using Web 2.0. Specifically, in the paper we suggest to adopt several principles to improve the dissemination of public sector information via Web 2.0, which can be introduced regulating e&#45;government, extending legislation on access to information or improving regulation on information re&#45;use when public sector information is diffused by public administration. When information is diffused by the public, other mechanisms are proposed like re&#45;use licences, codes of conduct, quality labels and terms and conditions, content rate systems and early warning and correction mechanisms.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJEG.2011.043818</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Electronic Governance, Vol. 4, No. 3 (2011) pp. 230 - 247</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Agusti Cerrillo&#45;i&#45;Martinez</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>public sector information</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>transparency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>information reuse</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>web 2.0</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>information diffusion</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>e&#45;government</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>electronic government</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>regulation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>public administration.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-11-23T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>230</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>247</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-23T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2011.043821">
<title>Portals adoption and implementation challenges in the public sector&#58; Oman case study</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43821</link>
<description>Portal is a smart Information Technology &#40;IT&#41; solution that facilitates the access and exchange of information resources. Users are able to pull relevant information from different databases according to the privileges and authorisation roles given by the data owners. Portal creates an efficient and effective real&#45;time interactive work environment. However, the effectiveness of a portal depends on the adoption approach and the achievement of the implementing organization&#39;s objectives. This paper investigates the portals adopted by government agencies in the Sultanate of Oman. It examines the portal implementation approaches and explores the obstacles facing adoption.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43821"><b>Portals adoption and implementation challenges in the public sector&#58; Oman case study</b></A><br />Ali H. Al&#45;Badi; Ali O. Al Majeeni; Pam J. Mayhew<br /><i>International Journal of Electronic Governance, Vol. 4, No. 3 (2011) pp. 248 - 258</i><br />Portal is a smart Information Technology &#40;IT&#41; solution that facilitates the access and exchange of information resources. Users are able to pull relevant information from different databases according to the privileges and authorisation roles given by the data owners. Portal creates an efficient and effective real&#45;time interactive work environment. However, the effectiveness of a portal depends on the adoption approach and the achievement of the implementing organization&#39;s objectives. This paper investigates the portals adopted by government agencies in the Sultanate of Oman. It examines the portal implementation approaches and explores the obstacles facing adoption.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJEG.2011.043821</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Electronic Governance, Vol. 4, No. 3 (2011) pp. 248 - 258</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Ali H. Al&#45;Badi; Ali O. Al Majeeni; Pam J. Mayhew</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Information Systems Department, College of Commerce and Economics, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman. &#39; School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. &#39; School of Computing Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>portal adoption</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>e&#45;services</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>gateway</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>government portals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>portlets</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>personalisation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>single sign on</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>resource aggregation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>public sector</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>information resources</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>government agencies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Oman</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>e&#45;government</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>electronic government</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>electronic services</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>online services</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>government services.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-11-23T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>248</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>258</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-23T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2011.043817">
<title>Multi&#45;perspective analysis of e&#45;governance performance&#58; a study of select agriculture related projects in India</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43817</link>
<description>There is a general lack of empirically founded measures for cross&#45;analysing the performance of e&#45;governance initiatives from the perspective of key stakeholders. This study attempts to fill such gap by proposing a construct based on commonly applicable performance aspects across key actor groups belonging to select agriculture related e&#45;governance projects in India. An analysis, based on the proposed construct, reveals that the performance of e&#45;governance is perceived differently by the three actor types. The study has implications for both researchers and practitioners.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43817"><b>Multi&#45;perspective analysis of e&#45;governance performance&#58; a study of select agriculture related projects in India</b></A><br />P.K. Suri;  Sushil<br /><i>International Journal of Electronic Governance, Vol. 4, No. 3 (2011) pp. 259 - 272</i><br />There is a general lack of empirically founded measures for cross&#45;analysing the performance of e&#45;governance initiatives from the perspective of key stakeholders. This study attempts to fill such gap by proposing a construct based on commonly applicable performance aspects across key actor groups belonging to select agriculture related e&#45;governance projects in India. An analysis, based on the proposed construct, reveals that the performance of e&#45;governance is perceived differently by the three actor types. The study has implications for both researchers and practitioners.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJEG.2011.043817</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Electronic Governance, Vol. 4, No. 3 (2011) pp. 259 - 272</dc:source>
<dc:creator>P.K. Suri;  Sushil</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Agricultural Informatics Division, National Informatics Centre, New Delhi 110003, India. &#39; Department of Management Studies, IIT Delhi, Vishawkarma Bhavan, New Delhi 110016, India</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>electronic governance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>electronic government</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>e&#45;governance performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>performance evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>e&#45;governance stakeholders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>stakeholder analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>multi&#45;perspective analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>agriculture</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>India</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>e&#45;government.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-11-23T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>259</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>272</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-23T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2011.043842">
<title>News and Briefs</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43842</link>
<description>Four developments are outlined. 1&#41; The US White House&#39;s new online petitioning tool, called We the People, has been released on WhiteHouse.gov. 2&#41; The UK&#45;based mySociety organisation has been developing useful online tools to address real&#45;world everyday&#45;life problems in UK since 2003. The newest mySociety online tool, FixMyTransport, allows passengers to report issues on any public transport in the UK   train, bus, underground, tram, or coach. 3&#41; Participatory budgeting, a democratic process in which community members directly debate and decide on how to spend part of a public budget, aims at giving people real decision&#45;making power over real money. New York City Council Members have announced that, starting from October 2011, they will use participatory budgeting to allocate some of their capital discretionary funds. 4&#41; In September 2011, the Brazilian government has issued an action plan for improving open government. The announcement came following the kick&#45;off of the Open Government Partnership &#40;OGP&#41; initiative, an effort that Brazil co&#45;chairs with the USA.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43842"><b>News and Briefs</b></A><br />Valentina Trikounaki; Eleni&#45;Revekka Staiou<br /><i>International Journal of Electronic Governance, Vol. 4, No. 3 (2011) pp. 273 - 274</i><br />Four developments are outlined. 1&#41; The US White House&#39;s new online petitioning tool, called We the People, has been released on WhiteHouse.gov. 2&#41; The UK&#45;based mySociety organisation has been developing useful online tools to address real&#45;world everyday&#45;life problems in UK since 2003. The newest mySociety online tool, FixMyTransport, allows passengers to report issues on any public transport in the UK   train, bus, underground, tram, or coach. 3&#41; Participatory budgeting, a democratic process in which community members directly debate and decide on how to spend part of a public budget, aims at giving people real decision&#45;making power over real money. New York City Council Members have announced that, starting from October 2011, they will use participatory budgeting to allocate some of their capital discretionary funds. 4&#41; In September 2011, the Brazilian government has issued an action plan for improving open government. The announcement came following the kick&#45;off of the Open Government Partnership &#40;OGP&#41; initiative, an effort that Brazil co&#45;chairs with the USA.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJEG.2011.043842</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Electronic Governance, Vol. 4, No. 3 (2011) pp. 273 - 274</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Valentina Trikounaki; Eleni&#45;Revekka Staiou</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Laboratory of New Technologies in Communication, Education and the Mass Media, University of Athens, Greece. &#39; Laboratory of New Technologies in Communication, Education and the Mass Media, University of Athens, Greece</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>online petitions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>online petitioning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>public transport</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>participatory budgeting</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>open government</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Brazil</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>USA</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>United States</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>UK</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>United Kingdom</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>e&#45;governance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>electronic governance.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-11-23T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>273</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>274</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-23T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>

