<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">
<channel rdf:about="http://www.inderscience.com/current_issue_rss/index.php?journal=ijact">
<title>Most recent issue published online for the International Journal of Applied Cryptography.</title>
<description>International Journal of Applied Cryptography</description>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=233&amp;year=2010&amp;vol=2&amp;issue=2</link>
<dc:publisher>Inderscience Publishers Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:language>en-uk</dc:language>
<prism:publicationName>International Journal of Applied Cryptography</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1753-0563</prism:issn>
<prism:eIssn>1753-0571</prism:eIssn>
<prism:copyright>&#169; 2010 Inderscience Publishers Ltd</prism:copyright>
<prism:rightsAgent>editor@inderscience.com</prism:rightsAgent>
<image rdf:resource="https://www.inderscience.com/images/files/coverImgs/ijact_scoverijact.jpg" />
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJACT.2010.038304" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJACT.2010.038305" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJACT.2010.038306" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJACT.2010.038307" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJACT.2010.038308" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJACT.2010.038309" />
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>
<image rdf:about="https://www.inderscience.com/images/files/coverImgs/ijact_scoverijact.jpg">
<title>International Journal of Applied Cryptography</title>
<url>https://www.inderscience.com/images/files/coverImgs/ijact_scoverijact.jpg</url>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=233&amp;year=2010&amp;vol=2&amp;issue=2</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJACT.2010.038304">
<title>Session&#45;StateReveal is stronger than eCKs EphemeralKeyReveal&#58; using automatic analysis to attack the NAXOS protocol</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=38304</link>
<description>In the paper, &#39;stronger security of authenticated key exchange&#39; &#40;LaMacchia et al., 2006, 2007&#41;, a new security model for authenticated key exchange protocols &#40;eCK&#41; is proposed. The new model is suggested to be at least as strong as previous models for key exchange protocols, such as the CK model &#40;Canetti and Krawczyk, 2001; Krawczyk, 2005&#41;. The model includes a new notion of an EphemeralKeyReveal adversary query, which is claimed in e.g., LaMacchia et al. &#40;2006&#41;, Okamoto &#40;2007&#41;, and Ustaoglu &#40;2008&#41;, to be at least as strong as the Session&#45;StateReveal query. We investigate the relation between the two models by focusing on the difference in adversary queries. We formally model the NAXOS protocol and a variant of the eCK model, called eCK&#39;, in which the EphemeralKeyReveal query is replaced by the Session&#45;StateReveal query. Using Scyther, a formal protocol analysis tool, we automatically find attacks on the protocol, showing that the protocol is insecure in the eCK&#39; model. Our attacks prove that the Session&#45;StateReveal query is stronger than the EphemeralKeyReveal query and that the eCK security model is incomparable to the CK model, disproving several claims made in the literature.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=38304"><b>Session&#45;StateReveal is stronger than eCKs EphemeralKeyReveal&#58; using automatic analysis to attack the NAXOS protocol</b></A><br />Cas J.F. Cremers<br /><i>International Journal of Applied Cryptography, Vol. 2, No. 2 (2010) pp. 83 - 99</i><br />In the paper, &#39;stronger security of authenticated key exchange&#39; &#40;LaMacchia et al., 2006, 2007&#41;, a new security model for authenticated key exchange protocols &#40;eCK&#41; is proposed. The new model is suggested to be at least as strong as previous models for key exchange protocols, such as the CK model &#40;Canetti and Krawczyk, 2001; Krawczyk, 2005&#41;. The model includes a new notion of an EphemeralKeyReveal adversary query, which is claimed in e.g., LaMacchia et al. &#40;2006&#41;, Okamoto &#40;2007&#41;, and Ustaoglu &#40;2008&#41;, to be at least as strong as the Session&#45;StateReveal query. We investigate the relation between the two models by focusing on the difference in adversary queries. We formally model the NAXOS protocol and a variant of the eCK model, called eCK&#39;, in which the EphemeralKeyReveal query is replaced by the Session&#45;StateReveal query. Using Scyther, a formal protocol analysis tool, we automatically find attacks on the protocol, showing that the protocol is insecure in the eCK&#39; model. Our attacks prove that the Session&#45;StateReveal query is stronger than the EphemeralKeyReveal query and that the eCK security model is incomparable to the CK model, disproving several claims made in the literature.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJACT.2010.038304</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Applied Cryptography, Vol. 2, No. 2 (2010) pp. 83 - 99</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Cas J.F. Cremers</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>provable security</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>authenticated key exchange</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>AKE</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>session state reveal</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>ephemeral key reveal</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>automatic analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>tools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>eCK</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>CK</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>NAXOS</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>security models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>adversary queries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>protocol attacks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>cryptography.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-01-28T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>83</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>99</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-01-28T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJACT.2010.038305">
<title>On message recognition protocols&#58; recoverability and explicit confirmation</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=38305</link>
<description>We look at message recognition protocols &#40;MRPs&#41; and prove that there is a one&#45;to&#45;one correspondence between stateless non&#45;interactive MRPs and digital signature schemes. Next, we examine the Jane Doe protocol and note its inability to recover in case of a certain adversarial disruption. We propose a variant of this protocol which is equipped with a resynchronisation technique that allows users to resynchronise whenever they wish. Moreover, we propose another protocol which self&#45;recovers in case of an intrusion. This protocol incorporates the resynchronisation technique within itself. Further, we enumerate all possible attacks against this protocol and show that none of the attacks can occur. Finally, we prove the security of the new protocol and its ability to self&#45;recover once the disruption has stopped. Finally, we propose an MRP which provides explicit confirmation to the sender on whether or not the message was accepted by the receiver.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=38305"><b>On message recognition protocols&#58; recoverability and explicit confirmation</b></A><br />Ian Goldberg, Atefeh Mashatan, Douglas R. Stinson<br /><i>International Journal of Applied Cryptography, Vol. 2, No. 2 (2010) pp. 100 - 120</i><br />We look at message recognition protocols &#40;MRPs&#41; and prove that there is a one&#45;to&#45;one correspondence between stateless non&#45;interactive MRPs and digital signature schemes. Next, we examine the Jane Doe protocol and note its inability to recover in case of a certain adversarial disruption. We propose a variant of this protocol which is equipped with a resynchronisation technique that allows users to resynchronise whenever they wish. Moreover, we propose another protocol which self&#45;recovers in case of an intrusion. This protocol incorporates the resynchronisation technique within itself. Further, we enumerate all possible attacks against this protocol and show that none of the attacks can occur. Finally, we prove the security of the new protocol and its ability to self&#45;recover once the disruption has stopped. Finally, we propose an MRP which provides explicit confirmation to the sender on whether or not the message was accepted by the receiver.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJACT.2010.038305</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Applied Cryptography, Vol. 2, No. 2 (2010) pp. 100 - 120</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Ian Goldberg</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Atefeh Mashatan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Douglas R. Stinson</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada. &#39; School of Computer and Communication Sciences, EPFL, CH&#45;1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. &#39; David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>message recognition protocols</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>self&#45;recoverability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>explicit confirmation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>pervasive networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>ad hoc networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>cryptographic protocols</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>message authentication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>recovery</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>cryptography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>digital signatures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>adversarial disruption</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>resynchronisation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>protocol attacks.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-01-28T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>100</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>120</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-01-28T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJACT.2010.038306">
<title>Theoretical and practical aspects of mutual information&#45;based side channel analysis</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=38306</link>
<description>A large variety of side channel analyses performed on embedded devices involve the linear correlation coefficient as wrong&#45;key distinguisher. This coefficient is actually a sound statistical tool to quantify linear dependencies between univariate variables. At CHES 2008, Gierlichs et al. proposed to use the mutual information measure as an alternative to the correlation coefficient since it detects any kind of statistical dependency. Substituting it for the correlation coefficient may indeed be considered as a natural extension of the existing attacks. Nevertheless, the first published applications have raised several open issues. In this paper, we conduct a theoretical analysis of MIA in the Gaussian leakage model to explore the reasons why and when it is a sound key recovery attack. Also, we generalise MIA to higher&#45;orders &#40;i.e., against masked implementations&#41;. Secondly, we address the main practical issue of MIA&#58; the mutual information estimation which itself relies on the estimation of statistical distributions. We describe three classical estimation methods and we apply them in the context of MIA. Eventually, we present various attack simulations and practical attack experiments that allow us to check the efficiency of MIA in practice and to compare it to classical correlation&#45;based attacks.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=38306"><b>Theoretical and practical aspects of mutual information&#45;based side channel analysis</b></A><br />E. Prouff, M. Rivain<br /><i>International Journal of Applied Cryptography, Vol. 2, No. 2 (2010) pp. 121 - 138</i><br />A large variety of side channel analyses performed on embedded devices involve the linear correlation coefficient as wrong&#45;key distinguisher. This coefficient is actually a sound statistical tool to quantify linear dependencies between univariate variables. At CHES 2008, Gierlichs et al. proposed to use the mutual information measure as an alternative to the correlation coefficient since it detects any kind of statistical dependency. Substituting it for the correlation coefficient may indeed be considered as a natural extension of the existing attacks. Nevertheless, the first published applications have raised several open issues. In this paper, we conduct a theoretical analysis of MIA in the Gaussian leakage model to explore the reasons why and when it is a sound key recovery attack. Also, we generalise MIA to higher&#45;orders &#40;i.e., against masked implementations&#41;. Secondly, we address the main practical issue of MIA&#58; the mutual information estimation which itself relies on the estimation of statistical distributions. We describe three classical estimation methods and we apply them in the context of MIA. Eventually, we present various attack simulations and practical attack experiments that allow us to check the efficiency of MIA in practice and to compare it to classical correlation&#45;based attacks.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJACT.2010.038306</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Applied Cryptography, Vol. 2, No. 2 (2010) pp. 121 - 138</dc:source>
<dc:creator>E. Prouff</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>M. Rivain</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Oberthur Technologies, 71&#45;73, rue des Hautes Patures, 92726 Nanterre Cedex, France. &#39; CryptoExperts, 37 Cours de Vincennes, F&#45;75020 Paris, France</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>applied cryptography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>embedded security</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>side channel analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>SCA</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>mutual information analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>MIA</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>density estimation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gaussian leakage model</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>key recovery attacks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>attack simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>correlation&#45;based attacks.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-01-28T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>121</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>138</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-01-28T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJACT.2010.038307">
<title>Fair threshold decryption with semi&#45;trusted third parties</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=38307</link>
<description>A threshold decryption scheme is a multi&#45;party public key cryptosystem that allows any sufficiently large subset of participants to decrypt a ciphertext, but disallows the decryption otherwise. Many threshold cryptographic schemes have been proposed so far, but fairness is not generally considered in this earlier work. In this paper, we present fair threshold decryption schemes, where either all of the participants can decrypt or none of them can. Our solutions employ semi&#45;trusted third parties &#40;STTP&#41; and offline semi&#45;trusted third parties &#40;OTTP&#41; previously used for fair exchange. We consider a number of variants of our schemes to address realistic alternative trust scenarios. Although we describe our schemes using a simple hashed version of ElGamal encryption, our methods generalise to other threshold decryption schemes and threshold signature schemes as well.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=38307"><b>Fair threshold decryption with semi&#45;trusted third parties</b></A><br />Jeongdae Hong, Jinil Kim, Jihye Kim, Matthew K. Franklin, Kunsoo Park<br /><i>International Journal of Applied Cryptography, Vol. 2, No. 2 (2010) pp. 139 - 153</i><br />A threshold decryption scheme is a multi&#45;party public key cryptosystem that allows any sufficiently large subset of participants to decrypt a ciphertext, but disallows the decryption otherwise. Many threshold cryptographic schemes have been proposed so far, but fairness is not generally considered in this earlier work. In this paper, we present fair threshold decryption schemes, where either all of the participants can decrypt or none of them can. Our solutions employ semi&#45;trusted third parties &#40;STTP&#41; and offline semi&#45;trusted third parties &#40;OTTP&#41; previously used for fair exchange. We consider a number of variants of our schemes to address realistic alternative trust scenarios. Although we describe our schemes using a simple hashed version of ElGamal encryption, our methods generalise to other threshold decryption schemes and threshold signature schemes as well.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJACT.2010.038307</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Applied Cryptography, Vol. 2, No. 2 (2010) pp. 139 - 153</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Jeongdae Hong</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Jinil Kim</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Jihye Kim</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Matthew K. Franklin</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Kunsoo Park</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>School of Computer Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Gwanak&#45;gu, Seoul 151&#45;742, South Korea. &#39; School of Computer Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Gwanak&#45;gu, Seoul 151&#45;742, South Korea. &#39; ISaC and Department of Mathematical Sciences, Seoul National University, Gwanak&#45;gu, Seoul 151&#45;742, South Korea. &#39; Department of Computer Science, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA. &#39; School of Computer Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Gwanak&#45;gu, Seoul 151&#45;742, South Korea</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>threshold decryption</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>fairness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>semi&#45;trusted third parties</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>STTP</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>optimistic protocol</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>ElGamal encryption</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>public key cryptosystems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>cryptography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>trust</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>threshold signature schemes.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-01-28T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>139</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>153</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-01-28T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJACT.2010.038308">
<title>On reusing ephemeral keys in Diffie&#45;Hellman key agreement protocols</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=38308</link>
<description>A party may choose to reuse ephemeral public keys in a Diffie&#45;Hellman key agreement protocol in order to reduce its computational workload or to mitigate against denial&#45;of&#45;service attacks. In this note, we show that small&#45;subgroup attacks can be successfully launched on some Diffie&#45;Hellman protocols that reuse ephemeral keys if domain parameters are not appropriately selected or if public keys are not appropriately validated.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=38308"><b>On reusing ephemeral keys in Diffie&#45;Hellman key agreement protocols</b></A><br />Alfred Menezes, Berkant Ustaoglu<br /><i>International Journal of Applied Cryptography, Vol. 2, No. 2 (2010) pp. 154 - 158</i><br />A party may choose to reuse ephemeral public keys in a Diffie&#45;Hellman key agreement protocol in order to reduce its computational workload or to mitigate against denial&#45;of&#45;service attacks. In this note, we show that small&#45;subgroup attacks can be successfully launched on some Diffie&#45;Hellman protocols that reuse ephemeral keys if domain parameters are not appropriately selected or if public keys are not appropriately validated.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJACT.2010.038308</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Applied Cryptography, Vol. 2, No. 2 (2010) pp. 154 - 158</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Alfred Menezes</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Berkant Ustaoglu</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Department of Combinatorics and Optimization, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada. &#39; Okamoto Research Laboratory, NTT Information Sharing Platform Laboratories, 3&#45;9&#45;11, Midori&#45;cho Musashino&#45;shi, Tokyo 180&#45;8585, Japan</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>key agreement protocols</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Diffie&#45;Hellman</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>ephemeral public keys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>cryptography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>computational workload</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>denial&#45;of&#45;service attacks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>ephemeral key reuse</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>domain parameter selection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>public key validation.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-01-28T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>154</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>158</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-01-28T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJACT.2010.038309">
<title>Unconditionally reliable and secure message transmission in undirected synchronous networks&#58; possibility, feasibility and optimality</title>
<link>http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=38309</link>
<description>We study the interplay of network connectivity and the issues related to the &#39;possibility&#39;, &#39;feasibility&#39; and &#39;optimality&#39; for unconditionally reliable message transmission &#40;URMT&#41; and unconditionally secure message transmission &#40;USMT&#41; in an undirected synchronous network, under the influence of an adaptive mixed adversary having unbounded computing power, who can corrupt some of the nodes in the network in Byzantine, omission, fail&#45;stop and passive fashion respectively. We consider two types of adversary, namely threshold and non&#45;threshold. One of the important conclusions we arrive at from our study is that allowing a negligible error probability significantly helps in the &#39;possibility&#39;, &#39;feasibility&#39; and &#39;optimality&#39; of both reliable and secure message transmission protocols. To design our protocols, we propose several new techniques which are of independent interest.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=38309"><b>Unconditionally reliable and secure message transmission in undirected synchronous networks&#58; possibility, feasibility and optimality</b></A><br />Arpita Patra, Ashish Choudhury, C. Pandu Rangan, Kannan Srinathan<br /><i>International Journal of Applied Cryptography, Vol. 2, No. 2 (2010) pp. 159 - 197</i><br />We study the interplay of network connectivity and the issues related to the &#39;possibility&#39;, &#39;feasibility&#39; and &#39;optimality&#39; for unconditionally reliable message transmission &#40;URMT&#41; and unconditionally secure message transmission &#40;USMT&#41; in an undirected synchronous network, under the influence of an adaptive mixed adversary having unbounded computing power, who can corrupt some of the nodes in the network in Byzantine, omission, fail&#45;stop and passive fashion respectively. We consider two types of adversary, namely threshold and non&#45;threshold. One of the important conclusions we arrive at from our study is that allowing a negligible error probability significantly helps in the &#39;possibility&#39;, &#39;feasibility&#39; and &#39;optimality&#39; of both reliable and secure message transmission protocols. To design our protocols, we propose several new techniques which are of independent interest.</p>]]></content:encoded>
<dc:identifier>10.1504/IJACT.2010.038309</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>International Journal of Applied Cryptography, Vol. 2, No. 2 (2010) pp. 159 - 197</dc:source>
<dc:creator>Arpita Patra</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Ashish Choudhury</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>C. Pandu Rangan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Kannan Srinathan</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India. &#39; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India. &#39; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India. &#39; Centre for Security, Theory and Algorithmic Research &#40;CSTAR&#41;, International Institute of Information Technology, Gachibowli, Hyderabad &amp;ndash; 500 032, Andhra Pradesh, India</dc:contributor>
<dc:subject>probabilistic reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>information theoretic security</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>mixed adversary</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>secure message transmission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>undirected synchronous networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>reliable message transmission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>network connectivity.</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2011-01-28T23:20:50-05:00</dc:date>
<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>159</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>197</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-01-28T23:20:50-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>

